* https://stackoverflow.com/a/35754308/28465
     *
     * In that explanation's notation, our `overlap` check would be `x1 < y2 && y1 < x2`. We've
     * flipped one part of the check so that we're using "less than" in both cases (rather than a
     * mix of "less than" and "greater than"). We've also switched to "strictly less than" rather
     * than "less than or equal to" because of *handwave* the difference between "endpoints of

  }

  /**
   * Returns {@code true} if each element in {@code iterable} after the first is greater than or
   * equal to the element that preceded it, according to the specified comparator. Note that this is
   * always true when the iterable has fewer than two elements.
   */
  public static <T extends @Nullable Object> boolean isInOrder(
      Iterable<? extends T> iterable, Comparator<T> comparator) {

  }

  /**
   * Returns {@code true} if each element in {@code iterable} after the first is greater than or
   * equal to the element that preceded it, according to the specified comparator. Note that this is
   * always true when the iterable has fewer than two elements.
   */
  public static <T extends @Nullable Object> boolean isInOrder(
      Iterable<? extends T> iterable, Comparator<T> comparator) {

     * https://stackoverflow.com/a/35754308/28465
     *
     * In that explanation's notation, our `overlap` check would be `x1 < y2 && y1 < x2`. We've
     * flipped one part of the check so that we're using "less than" in both cases (rather than a
     * mix of "less than" and "greater than"). We've also switched to "strictly less than" rather
     * than "less than or equal to" because of *handwave* the difference between "endpoints of

	// SS parity drives should be greater than or equal to minParityDrives.
	// Parity below minParityDrives is not supported.
	if ssParity > 0 && ssParity < minParityDrives {
		return fmt.Errorf("parity %d should be greater than or equal to %d",
			ssParity, minParityDrives)
	}

	if ssParity > setDriveCount/2 {
		return fmt.Errorf("parity %d should be less than or equal to %d", ssParity, setDriveCount/2)
	}

  }

  /**
   * Returns {@code true} if each element in {@code iterable} after the first is greater than or
   * equal to the element that preceded it, according to this ordering. Note that this is always
   * true when the iterable has fewer than two elements.
   *
   * <p><b>Java 8+ users:</b> Use the equivalent {@link Comparators#isInOrder(Iterable, Comparator)}

            assertTrue(Smb2Constants.SMB2_DIALECT_0210 < Smb2Constants.SMB2_DIALECT_0300, "SMB 2.1 should be less than SMB 3.0");
            assertTrue(Smb2Constants.SMB2_DIALECT_0300 < Smb2Constants.SMB2_DIALECT_0302, "SMB 3.0 should be less than SMB 3.0.2");

   * perform better than its longhand equivalent, but should not perform worse.
   *
   * @since 23.0
   */
  HashCode hashBytes(ByteBuffer input);

  /**
   * Shortcut for {@code newHasher().putUnencodedChars(input).hash()}. The implementation
   * <i>might</i> perform better than its longhand equivalent, but should not perform worse. Note

   * <p>If {@code value} is within the range {@code [min..max]}, {@code value} is returned
   * unchanged. If {@code value} is less than {@code min}, {@code min} is returned, and if {@code
   * value} is greater than {@code max}, {@code max} is returned.
   *
   * <p><b>Java 21+ users:</b> Use {@code Math.clamp} instead. Note that that method is capable of
   * constraining a {@code long} input to an {@code int} range.
   *

        return true;
      }
      if (object instanceof CharArrayAsList) {
        CharArrayAsList that = (CharArrayAsList) object;
        int size = size();
        if (that.size() != size) {
          return false;
        }
        for (int i = 0; i < size; i++) {
          if (array[start + i] != that.array[that.start + i]) {
            return false;
          }
        }
        return true;
      }