/// tip

Check the docs about [adding a pull request review](https://help.github.com/en/github/collaborating-with-issues-and-pull-requests/about-pull-request-reviews) to approve it or request changes.

///

PRs with suggestions to the language-specific LLM prompt require approval from at least one native speaker. Your help here is very much appreciated!

#### Subscribe to Notifications for Your Language

-   If all looks good, the reviewer will approve the PR.
-   If a change is needed, the contributor is requested to make the suggested
    change.
-   You make the change and submit it for the review again.
-   This cycle repeats itself until the PR gets approved.
-   Note: As a friendly reminder, we may reach out to you if the PR is awaiting
    your response for more than 2 weeks.

**4. Approved**

Once a native speaker comes, reviews the PR, and approves it, the GitHub Action will come and remove the `awaiting-review` label, and add the `approved-1` label.

This way, we can notice when there are new translations ready, because they have the `approved-1` label.

## Merge Translation PRs

Translations are generated automatically with LLMs and scripts.

     * Files that should be excluded from the license header check. Use with extreme care, only in situations where the license on the
     * source file is compatible with the codebase but we do not want to add the license to the list of approved headers (to avoid the
     * possibility of inadvertently using the license on our own source files).
     */
    @Input
    private List<String> excludes = new ArrayList<String>();
    /**

import httpx
from github import Github
from pydantic import BaseModel, SecretStr
from pydantic_settings import BaseSettings

awaiting_label = "awaiting-review"
lang_all_label = "lang-all"
approved_label = "approved-1"


github_graphql_url = "https://api.github.com/graphql"
questions_translations_category_id = "DIC_kwDOCZduT84CT5P9"

all_discussions_query = """
query Q($category_id: ID) {

			continue
		}
		if needApproval {
			feature, approval, ok := strings.Cut(line, "#")
			if !ok {
				log.Printf("%s:%d: missing proposal approval\n", filename, i+1)
				exitCode = 1
			} else {
				_, err := strconv.Atoi(approval)
				if err != nil {
					log.Printf("%s:%d: malformed proposal approval #%s\n", filename, i+1, approval)
					exitCode = 1
				}
			}
			line = strings.TrimSpace(feature)

        SnapshotVersion sv1 = addSnapshotVersion(source.getVersioning(), date, artifact);
        // although nothing has changed merge returns true, as the last modified date is equal
        // TODO: improve merge here?
        assertTrue(target.merge(source));
        assertEquals(1, target.getVersioning().getSnapshotVersions().size());
        assertEquals(sv1, target.getVersioning().getSnapshotVersions().get(0));

      <artifactId>okio</artifactId>
      <version>1.3.0</version>
    </dependency>
    ```

 *  **Fix: improve parallelism of async requests.** OkHttp's Dispatcher had a
    misconfigured `ExecutorService` that limited the number of worker threads.
    If you're using `Call.enqueue()` this update should significantly improve
    request concurrency.

 *  **Fix: Lazily initialize the response cache.** This avoids strict mode

    private final ExecutionList executionList = new ExecutionList();

    /** Constructor for use by subclasses. */
    protected OldAbstractFuture() {}

    /*
     * Improve the documentation of when InterruptedException is thrown. Our
     * behavior matches the JDK's, but the JDK's documentation is misleading.
     */
    /**
     * {@inheritDoc}
     *

    private final ExecutionList executionList = new ExecutionList();

    /** Constructor for use by subclasses. */
    protected OldAbstractFuture() {}

    /*
     * Improve the documentation of when InterruptedException is thrown. Our
     * behavior matches the JDK's, but the JDK's documentation is misleading.
     */
    /**
     * {@inheritDoc}
     *