-   If all looks good, the reviewer will approve the PR.
-   If a change is needed, the contributor is requested to make the suggested
    change.
-   You make the change and submit it for the review again.
-   This cycle repeats itself until the PR gets approved.
-   Note: As a friendly reminder, we may reach out to you if the PR is awaiting
    your response for more than 2 weeks.

**4. Approved**

</div>

## Top Translation Reviewers

These users are the **Top Translation Reviewers**. 🕵️

I only speak a few languages (and not very well 😅). So, the reviewers are the ones that have the [**power to approve translations**](contributing.md#translations){.internal-link target=_blank} of the documentation. Without them, there wouldn't be documentation in several other languages.

<div class="user-list user-list-center">

Check the docs about <a href="https://help.github.com/en/github/collaborating-with-issues-and-pull-requests/about-pull-request-reviews" class="external-link" target="_blank">adding a pull request review</a> to approve it or request changes.

///

Once a native speaker comes, reviews the PR, and approves it, the GitHub Action will come and remove the `awaiting-review` label, and add the `approved-1` label.

This way, we can notice when there are new translations ready, because they have the `approved-1` label.

## Merge Translation PRs

			continue
		}
		if needApproval {
			feature, approval, ok := strings.Cut(line, "#")
			if !ok {
				log.Printf("%s:%d: missing proposal approval\n", filename, i+1)
				exitCode = 1
			} else {
				_, err := strconv.Atoi(approval)
				if err != nil {
					log.Printf("%s:%d: malformed proposal approval #%s\n", filename, i+1, approval)
					exitCode = 1
				}
			}
			line = strings.TrimSpace(feature)

    private final ExecutionList executionList = new ExecutionList();

    /** Constructor for use by subclasses. */
    protected OldAbstractFuture() {}

    /*
     * Improve the documentation of when InterruptedException is thrown. Our
     * behavior matches the JDK's, but the JDK's documentation is misleading.
     */
    /**
     * {@inheritDoc}
     *

      <artifactId>okio</artifactId>
      <version>1.3.0</version>
    </dependency>
    ```

 *  **Fix: improve parallelism of async requests.** OkHttp's Dispatcher had a
    misconfigured `ExecutorService` that limited the number of worker threads.
    If you're using `Call.enqueue()` this update should significantly improve
    request concurrency.

 *  **Fix: Lazily initialize the response cache.** This avoids strict mode

 * <p>
 * This class provides methods to configure the XPath expressions, parser features, and properties.
 * It also includes caching mechanism for XPathAPI instances to improve performance.
 * </p>
 * <p>
 * The extracted text is obtained from the nodes selected by the {@code targetNodePath} XPath expression.

for normal archives both fields will be the same. For files requiring
the ZIP64 format the 32 bit fields will be 0xffffffff and the 64 bit
fields must be used instead.

[ZIP specification]: https://support.pkware.com/pkzip/appnote
*/
package zip

import (
	"io/fs"
	"path"
	"time"
)

// Compression methods.
const (
	Store   uint16 = 0 // no compression
	Deflate uint16 = 8 // DEFLATE compressed
)

const (

    /**
     * Counter for generating unique session identifiers.
     */
    protected int count = 1;

    /**
     * Cache for storing crawling configurations to improve performance.
     */
    protected Cache<String, CrawlingConfig> crawlingConfigCache;

    /**
     * Initializes the CrawlingConfigHelper by setting up the crawling configuration cache.