* the first are ignored.
   */
  public static <E> ImmutableSet<E> of(E e1, E e2) {
    return new RegularSetBuilderImpl<E>(2).add(e1).add(e2).review().build();
  }

  /**
   * Returns an immutable set containing the given elements, minus duplicates, in the order each was

    /*
     * The entrySet() of ConcurrentHashMap, unlike that of other Map
     * implementations, supports add() under JDK8. This seems problematic, but I
     * didn't see that discussed in the review, which included many other
     * changes: https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2013-May/thread.html#17367
     *
     * TODO(cpovirk): decide what the best long-term action here is: force users

    /*
     * The entrySet() of ConcurrentHashMap, unlike that of other Map
     * implementations, supports add() under JDK8. This seems problematic, but I
     * didn't see that discussed in the review, which included many other
     * changes: https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2013-May/thread.html#17367
     *
     * TODO(cpovirk): decide what the best long-term action here is: force users

   * would declare a return type of `@Nullable T[]`. However, we've decided not to think too hard
   * about arrays for now, as they're a mess. (We previously discussed this in the review of
   * ObjectArrays, which is the main caller of this method.)
   */
  static <T extends @Nullable Object> T[] newArray(T[] reference, int length) {

   * would declare a return type of `@Nullable T[]`. However, we've decided not to think too hard
   * about arrays for now, as they're a mess. (We previously discussed this in the review of
   * ObjectArrays, which is the main caller of this method.)
   */
  static <T extends @Nullable Object> T[] newArray(T[] reference, int length) {

issue if there is one) requesting the feature and describing specific use cases
for it.

If the feature has merit, it will go through a thorough process of API design
and review. Any code should come after this.

[APIs]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Application_programming_interface
[issue]: https://github.com/google/guava/issues

Pull requests
-------------

      }
    }

    // The following try/catch block is a pseudo hacky way to get around a crash on Android 7.0
    // More details:
    // https://github.com/square/okhttp/issues/3245
    // https://android-review.googlesource.com/#/c/271775/
    try {
      this.socket = rawSocket.asBufferedSocket()
    } catch (npe: NullPointerException) {
      if (npe.message == NPE_THROW_WITH_NULL) {
        throw IOException(npe)

 * Any additional information that may be helpful.

After filing a report, a representative from the Square Code of Conduct committee will contact you
personally. The committee will then review the incident, follow up with any additional questions,
and make a decision as to how to respond.

Anyone asked to stop unacceptable behavior is expected to comply immediately. If an individual

**How can I mitigate this prior to installing 1.5.5?**

1. Export existing PodSecurityPolicy objects:
  * `kubectl get podsecuritypolicies -o yaml > psp.yaml`
2. Review and delete any PodSecurityPolicy objects you do not want all pod-creating users to be able to use (NOTE: Privileged users that were making use of those policies will also lose access to those policies). For example:

webview-assets.aws-cloud9.me-south-1.amazonaws.com
webview-assets.aws-cloud9.sa-east-1.amazonaws.com
webview-assets.aws-cloud9.us-east-1.amazonaws.com
webview-assets.aws-cloud9.us-east-2.amazonaws.com
webview-assets.aws-cloud9.us-west-1.amazonaws.com
webview-assets.aws-cloud9.us-west-2.amazonaws.com
webview-assets.cloud9.af-south-1.amazonaws.com
webview-assets.cloud9.ap-east-1.amazonaws.com
webview-assets.cloud9.ap-northeast-1.amazonaws.com