resolve.expectGraph {
            root(":", ":test:") {
                edge('org:testA:1.0', 'org:testB:1.0')
                    .byConflictResolution("On capability org.test:cap we like testB better")
                module('org:testB:1.0')
            }
        }

        where:
        rule << [
            "select(candidates.find { it.id.module == 'testB'})",
            "select('org:testB:1.0')",

        List<XCTestCaseElement> testCases = [
            passingTestCase("testA"),
        ]
    }

    final XCTestSourceFileElement alternateFooTestSuite = new XCTestSourceFileElement("FooTestSuite") {
        List<XCTestCaseElement> testCases = [
            passingTestCase("testA"),
            passingTestCase("testB")
        ]
    }

	foo511()
}

// Nil checks before calling interface methods.
// We need it only when the offset is large.

func callMethodSmallOffset(i I) {
	// amd64:-"TESTB"
	i.foo001()
}

func callMethodLargeOffset(i I) {
	// amd64:"TESTB"
	i.foo511()

            rootProject.name = 'testA'
            gradle.rootProject {
                def c = configurations.create('compile')
                def d = configurations.create('default')
                group = 'test'
                version = '1.2'
                def jar = tasks.create("jar", Jar) {
                    dependsOn c
                    archiveBaseName = "test"
                    destinationDirectory = buildDir

        List<XCTestCaseElement> testCases = [
            passingTestCase("testA"),
            passingTestCase("testB")
        ]
    }

    final XCTestSourceFileElement alternateFooTestSuite = new XCTestSourceFileElement("FooTestSuite") {
        List<XCTestCaseElement> testCases = [
            passingTestCase("testA")
        ]
    }

# This test makes sure workspace mode's handling of the module graph
# is compatible with module pruning. The graph we load from either of
# the workspace modules should be the same, even if their graphs
# don't overlap.
#
# This is the module graph in the test:
#
#  example.com/a -> example.com/b v1.0.0 -> example.com/q v1.1.0
#  example.com/p -> example.com/q v1.0.0
#
# If we didn't load the whole graph and didn't load the dependencies of b

# This test exercises that vendoring works properly using the workspace in the
# the work_prune test case.

go work vendor
cmp vendor/modules.txt modules.txt.want
cmp vendor/example.com/b/b.go b/b.go
cmp vendor/example.com/q/q.go q1_1_0/q.go
go list -m -f '{{.Version}}' example.com/q
stdout '^v1.1.0$'

go list -f '{{.Dir}}' example.com/q
stdout $GOPATH[\\/]src[\\/]vendor[\\/]example.com[\\/]q
go list -f '{{.Dir}}' example.com/b

[short] skip

# test fail fast
! go test ./failfast_test.go -run='TestFailingA' -failfast=true
stdout -count=1 'FAIL - '
! go test ./failfast_test.go -run='TestFailing[AB]' -failfast=true
stdout -count=1 'FAIL - '
! go test ./failfast_test.go -run='TestFailing[AB]' -failfast=false
stdout -count=2 'FAIL - '

# mix with non-failing tests
! go test ./failfast_test.go -run='TestA|TestFailing[AB]' -failfast=true
stdout -count=1 'FAIL - '

# packages); prior to the fix for #58770 Go 1.20 would show 100%
# coverage. For packages "x" and "f" (which have no tests), check for
# 0% stmts covered (as opposed to "no test files").

go test -count=1 -coverprofile=cov.dat -coverpkg=./... ./...
stdout '^\s*\?\s+M/n\s+\[no test files\]'
stdout '^\s*M/x\s+coverage: 0.0% of statements'
stdout '^\s*M/f\s+coverage: 0.0% of statements'

# run for a collection of packages, mostly independent (hence tests can
# be done in parallel) and in the original bug, temp coverage profile
# files were not being properly qualified and were colliding, resulting
# in a corrupted final profile. Actual content of the packages doesn't
# especially matter as long as we have a mix of packages with tests and
# multiple packages without tests.

[short] skip