{* ../../docs_src/extra_models/tutorial005_py310.py hl[6] *}

## Özet { #recap }

Her duruma göre birden fazla Pydantic modeli kullanın ve gerekirse özgürce inheritance uygulayın.

    /**
     * Gets the problems that were encountered during the settings building. Note that only problems of severity
     * {@link BuilderProblem.Severity#WARNING} and below are reported here. Problems with a higher severity level cause
     * the settings builder to fail with a {@link SettingsBuilderException}.
     *
     * @return the problems that were encountered during the settings building, can be empty but never {@code null}

    /**
     * Gets the problems that were encountered during the settings building. Note that only problems of severity
     * {@link BuilderProblem.Severity#WARNING} and below are reported here. Problems with a higher severity level cause
     * the settings builder to fail with a {@link ToolchainsBuilderException}.
     *
     * @return the problems that were encountered during the settings building, can be empty but never {@code null}

ut
sin
dem
oss
opp
man
kan
hans
hvor
eller
hva
skal
selv
sjøl
her
alle
vil
bli
ble
blei
blitt
kunne
inn
når
være
kom
noen
noe
ville
dere
som
deres
kun
ja
etter
ned
skulle
denne
for
deg
si
sine
sitt
mot
å
meget
hvorfor
dette
disse
uten
hvordan
ingen
din
ditt
blir
samme

   * analysis that that means "plain {@code T}" rather than the inferred type {@code @Nullable T}.
   * (And even if annotations on local variables were permitted as an optional hint, no annotation
   * would be the right tool for the job here: {@code @Nullable} is the annotation that we're trying
   * to get rid of, and {@code @NonNull} would be wrong for our use case for the same reason as

   * analysis that that means "plain {@code T}" rather than the inferred type {@code @Nullable T}.
   * (And even if annotations on local variables were permitted as an optional hint, no annotation
   * would be the right tool for the job here: {@code @Nullable} is the annotation that we're trying
   * to get rid of, and {@code @NonNull} would be wrong for our use case for the same reason as

  private static final long K1 = 0x0f0e0d0c0b0a0908L;
  private static final HashFunction SIP_WITH_KEY = sipHash24(K0, K1);
  private static final HashFunction SIP_WITHOUT_KEY = sipHash24();

  // These constants were originally ported from https://www.131002.net/siphash/siphash24.c. See:
  // https://github.com/nahi/siphash-java-inline/blob/master/src/test/java/org/jruby/util/SipHashInlineTest.java
  private static final long[] EXPECTED =

  private static final long K1 = 0x0f0e0d0c0b0a0908L;
  private static final HashFunction SIP_WITH_KEY = sipHash24(K0, K1);
  private static final HashFunction SIP_WITHOUT_KEY = sipHash24();

  // These constants were originally ported from https://www.131002.net/siphash/siphash24.c. See:
  // https://github.com/nahi/siphash-java-inline/blob/master/src/test/java/org/jruby/util/SipHashInlineTest.java
  private static final long[] EXPECTED =

  public void testTimeoutOnGetWorksCorrectly() throws InterruptedException, ExecutionException {

    // The task thread waits for the latch, so we expect a timeout here.
    try {
      future.get(20, MILLISECONDS);
      fail("Should have timed out trying to get the value.");
    } catch (TimeoutException expected) {
    } finally {
      latch.countDown();
    }
  }

      label: Privileged issue
      description: Confirm that you are allowed to create an issue here.
      options:
        - label: I'm @tiangolo or he asked me directly to create an issue here.
          required: true
  - type: textarea
    id: content
    attributes:
      label: Issue Content