}

const minReadBufferSize = 16
const maxConsecutiveEmptyReads = 100

// NewReaderSize returns a new [Reader] whose buffer has at least the specified
// size. If the argument io.Reader is already a [Reader] with large enough
// size, it returns the underlying [Reader].
func NewReaderSize(rd io.Reader, size int) *Reader {
	// Is it already a Reader?
	b, ok := rd.(*Reader)
	if ok && len(b.buf) >= size {
		return b
	}

            // With size = 6 * 2 = 12, should produce "000F107F80FF"
            assertTrue(result.contains("000F107F80FF"));
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Large challenge array is handled correctly")
        void testLargeChallengeArray() {
            byte[] challenge = new byte[16];
            for (int i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
                challenge[i] = (byte) i;

   * typically useful for {@code return} statements. That leaves the code with two options: Either
   * add the suppression to the whole method (which turns off checking for a large section of code),
   * or extract a variable, and put the suppression on that. However, a local variable typically
   * doesn't work: Because nullness analyses typically infer the nullness of local variables,

   * typically useful for {@code return} statements. That leaves the code with two options: Either
   * add the suppression to the whole method (which turns off checking for a large section of code),
   * or extract a variable, and put the suppression on that. However, a local variable typically
   * doesn't work: Because nullness analyses typically infer the nullness of local variables,

        }

        if (buffer.length > maxSize) {
            failedValidations.incrementAndGet();
            bufferOverflowsPrevented.incrementAndGet();
            log.warn("Response buffer too large: {} > {}", buffer.length, maxSize);
            throw new SmbException("Response buffer exceeds maximum: " + buffer.length + " > " + maxSize);
        }
    }

    /**
     * Validate buffer access bounds
     *

### 5. (optional) Any other info / logs

        assertEquals(expectedTime, decoded.getLastWriteTime());
        assertEquals(0, decoded.getAttributes());
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test with large time values")
    void testWithLargeTimeValues() throws SMBProtocolDecodingException {
        // Use large but valid time values
        long largeTime = System.currentTimeMillis() + 365L * 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000; // 1 year from now
        int maxAttributes = Integer.MAX_VALUE;

        
        int dataSize = getDataSize(request);
        return dataSize > 8192 && dataSize <= maxReadWriteSize;  // Use RDMA for large transfers
    }
    
    private void sendWithRdmaReadWrite(ServerMessageBlock2 request) throws IOException {
        // For large data transfers, use RDMA read/write
        
        if (request instanceof Smb2ReadRequest) {
            handleRdmaRead((Smb2ReadRequest) request);

* What test cases should it have? What could go wrong?
* How will it roughly be implemented? We'll happily provide code pointers to save you time.

We may ask you to answer these questions directly in the GitHub issue or (for large changes) in a shared Google Doc.

Please note that some features may be out of the team's current focus, and it can take significant time for the team to review the PR thoroughly and address it fully.

### Security vulnerabilities

      }
    }
  }

  /**
   * Used to delay string formatting until actually required, as it otherwise shows up in the test
   * execution profile when running an extremely large numbers of tests.
   */
  private String reportContext(List<E> expected) {
    return Platform.format(
        "expected collection %s; actual collection %s", expected, this.collection);
  }