*
   * <p>Why <i>not</i> just add {@code SuppressWarnings}? The problem is that this method is
   * typically useful for {@code return} statements. That leaves the code with two options: Either
   * add the suppression to the whole method (which turns off checking for a large section of code),
   * or extract a variable, and put the suppression on that. However, a local variable typically

# OSX leaves these everywhere on SMB shares
._*

# OSX trash
.DS_Store

# Developers can store local stuff in dirs named __something
__*

# Eclipse files
.classpath
.project
.settings/**

# Files generated by JetBrains IDEs, e.g. IntelliJ IDEA
.idea/
*.iml

# Vscode files
.vscode

# This is where the result of the go build goes
/output*/
/_output*/
/_output

# Emacs save files
*~
\#*\#

    'full_name': None,
}
```

#### Desembrulhando um `dict`

Se tomarmos um `dict` como `user_dict` e passarmos para uma função (ou classe) com `**user_dict`, o Python irá "desembrulhá-lo". Ele passará as chaves e valores do `user_dict` diretamente como argumentos chave-valor.

Então, continuando com o `user_dict` acima, escrevendo:

```Python
UserInDB(**user_dict)
```

Resultaria em algo equivalente a:

```Python

   *
   * <p>Why <i>not</i> just add {@code SuppressWarnings}? The problem is that this method is
   * typically useful for {@code return} statements. That leaves the code with two options: Either
   * add the suppression to the whole method (which turns off checking for a large section of code),
   * or extract a variable, and put the suppression on that. However, a local variable typically

   *
   * <p>Why <i>not</i> just add {@code SuppressWarnings}? The problem is that this method is
   * typically useful for {@code return} statements. That leaves the code with two options: Either
   * add the suppression to the whole method (which turns off checking for a large section of code),
   * or extract a variable, and put the suppression on that. However, a local variable typically

   *
   * <p>Why <i>not</i> just add {@code SuppressWarnings}? The problem is that this method is
   * typically useful for {@code return} statements. That leaves the code with two options: Either
   * add the suppression to the whole method (which turns off checking for a large section of code),
   * or extract a variable, and put the suppression on that. However, a local variable typically

   questions. Those who are asked should be responsive and helpful.

 * **Step down considerately**: Members of every project come and go. When somebody leaves or
   disengages from the project, they should make it known and take the proper steps to ensure that
   others can pick up where they left off.

### `Body` com vários `examples`

Alternativamente ao único `example`, você pode passar `examples` usando um `dict` com **vários examples**, cada um com informações extras que serão adicionadas no **OpenAPI** também.

As chaves do `dict` identificam cada exemplo, e cada valor é outro `dict`.

Cada `dict` de exemplo específico em `examples` pode conter:

* `summary`: Pequena descrição do exemplo.

* Bump addon-manager to v9.0.1 ([#77282](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/77282),...

   *
   * <p><b>Comparison to {@code java.util.Optional}:</b> this class leaves the specific choice of
   * hash code unspecified, unlike the Java 8+ equivalent.
   */
  @Override
  public abstract int hashCode();

  /**
   * Returns a string representation for this instance.
   *
   * <p><b>Comparison to {@code java.util.Optional}:</b> this class leaves the specific string