final Cache<Integer, Integer> cache = CacheBuilder.newBuilder().build();

    Callable<Integer> loader =
        new Callable<Integer>() {
          private int i = 0;

          @Override
          public Integer call() throws Exception {
            return ++i;
          }
        };

    cache.put(0, 10);

    assertEquals(Integer.valueOf(10), cache.get(0, loader));
    assertEquals(Integer.valueOf(1), cache.get(20, loader));

	"BCC":   true,
	"BLO":   true,
	"BMI":   true,
	"BPL":   true,
	"BVS":   true,
	"BVC":   true,
	"BHI":   true,
	"BLS":   true,
	"BGE":   true,
	"BLT":   true,
	"BGT":   true,
	"BLE":   true,
	"CALL":  true,
	"CBZ":   true,
	"CBZW":  true,
	"CBNZ":  true,
	"CBNZW": true,
	"JMP":   true,
	"TBNZ":  true,
	"TBZ":   true,

	// ADR isn't really a jump, but it takes a PC or label reference,

 * try-with-resources. To get the equivalent of that, you must wrap the above code in <i>another</i>
 * try block in order to catch any exception that may be thrown (including from the call to {@code
 * close()}).
 *
 * <p>This pattern ensures the following:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>Each {@code Closeable} resource that is successfully registered will be closed later.

   * list must be sorted into ascending order according to the specified comparator (as by the
   * {@link Collections#sort(List, Comparator) Collections.sort(List, Comparator)} method), prior to
   * making this call. If it is not sorted, the results are undefined.
   *
   * <p>If there are elements in the list which compare as equal to the key, the choice of {@link

* <a href="https://github.com/swagger-api/swagger-ui" class="external-link" target="_blank"><strong>Swagger UI</strong></a>, with interactive exploration, call and test your API directly from the browser.

![Swagger UI interaction](https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/img/index/index-03-swagger-02.png)

    throw new IndexOutOfBoundsException("Index exceeds specified range");
  }

  /**
   * Helper method to grow the character buffer as needed, this only happens once in a while so it's
   * ok if it's in a method call. If the index passed in is 0 then no copying will be done.
   */
  private static char[] growBuffer(char[] dest, int index, int size) {
    if (size < 0) { // overflow - should be OutOfMemoryError but GWT/j2cl don't support it

      if (value == 8) {
        iter.remove();
      }
    }
    assertIntact(q);
    assertThat(result).containsExactly(1, 15, 13, 8, 14);
  }

  /**
   * This tests a special case of the removeAt() call. Moving an element sideways on the heap could
   * break the invariants. Sometimes we need to bubble an element up instead of trickling down. See
   * implementation.
   */
  public void testInvalidatingRemove() {

			if oi.DeleteMarker != object.addDeleteMarker {
				t.Fatalf("Expected, marker %t : got %t", object.addDeleteMarker, oi.DeleteMarker)
			}
		}
	}

	// Formulating the result data set to be expected from ListObjects call inside the tests,
	// This will be used in testCases and used for asserting the correctness of ListObjects output in the tests.

	resultCases := []ListObjectsInfo{
		{
			IsTruncated: false,

    assertTransformIterator(list);
  }

  /**
   * This test depends on the fact that {@code AbstractSequentialList.iterator} transforms the
   * {@code iterator()} call into a call on {@code listIterator(int)}. This is fine because the
   * behavior is clearly documented so it's not expected to change.
   */
  public void testTransformedSequentialIterationUsesBackingListIterationOnly() {

    assertTransformIterator(list);
  }

  /**
   * This test depends on the fact that {@code AbstractSequentialList.iterator} transforms the
   * {@code iterator()} call into a call on {@code listIterator(int)}. This is fine because the
   * behavior is clearly documented so it's not expected to change.
   */
  public void testTransformedSequentialIterationUsesBackingListIterationOnly() {