}

  /*
   * Whenever an implementation uses `instanceof` on a parameter instance, the test has to know that
   * (so much for "black box") and try instances that both do and don't pass the check. The "don't"
   * half of that is more awkward to arrange...
   */
  private static <T> Iterable<T> iterable(Collection<T> collection) {
    // return collection::iterator;

            assertArrayEquals(testFileId, closeResponse.getFileId());
            assertNull(closeResponse.getFileName());
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Constructor should accept both null parameters")
        void testConstructorWithBothNull() {
            // When
            Smb2CloseResponse closeResponse = new Smb2CloseResponse(mockConfig, null, null);

            // Then

    logger.addHandler(logHandler);
    ServiceManager manager =
        new ServiceManager(Arrays.<Service>asList(new FailRunService(), new FailStartService()));
    // Due to the implementation of the two services we know that both are now failed.  So the
    // following awaitHealthy call is just to get the exception.
    manager.startAsync();
    assertThat(manager.servicesByState().get(State.FAILED)).hasSize(2);
    IllegalStateException e =

            len += pad8(bufferIndex);
        } else if (compound && this.nextCommand == 0 && this.readSize > 0) {
            // Apply compound response handling as per MS-SMB2 3.2.5.1.9 - correct for both compound and single responses
            // 3.2.5.1.9 Handling Compounded Responses
            // The final response in the compounded response chain will have NextCommand equal to 0,

 * done by determining whether the domain ended with a {@linkplain #isPublicSuffix() public suffix}
 * but was not itself a public suffix. However, this test is no longer accurate. There are many
 * domains which are both public suffixes and addressable as hosts; {@code "uk.com"} is one example.
 * Using the subset of public suffixes that are {@linkplain #isRegistrySuffix() registry suffixes},

			m:    metaCacheEntries{inputSerialized[0], inputSerialized[0], inputSerialized[0], inputSerialized[2]},
			r:    metadataResolutionParams{dirQuorum: 1, objQuorum: 1, strict: true},
			// We get the both versions, since we only request quorum 1
			wantSelected: &inputSerialized[2],
			wantOk:       true,
		},
		{
			name:         "additional version, quorum two",

     * nullness annotations in ImmutableMap and those in its own Map type. In response, it considers
     * the parameter and return type both to be platform types. As a result, Kotlin permits calls
     * that can lead to NullPointerException. That's unfortunate. But hopefully most Kotlin callers
     * use `get(key) ?: defaultValue` instead of this method, anyway.

    // Leading.
    assertThat(parse("http://host/\u000c\n\t \r")).isEqualTo(expected)
    // Trailing.
    assertThat(parse("\r\n\u000c \thttp://host/")).isEqualTo(expected)
    // Both.
    assertThat(parse(" http://host/ ")).isEqualTo(expected)
    // Both.
    assertThat(parse("    http://host/    ")).isEqualTo(expected)
    assertThat(parse("http://host/").resolve("   ")).isEqualTo(expected)

     * contrast to the "V?" type that we're using. As a result, Kotlin sees a conflict between the
     * nullness annotations in ImmutableMap and those in its own Map type. In response, it considers
     * the parameter and return type both to be platform types. As a result, Kotlin permits calls
     * that can lead to NullPointerException. That's unfortunate. But hopefully most Kotlin callers
     * use `get(key) ?: defaultValue` instead of this method, anyway.

You will see the JSON response as:

```JSON
{"item_id": 5, "q": "somequery"}
```

You already created an API that:

* Receives HTTP requests in the _paths_ `/` and `/items/{item_id}`.
* Both _paths_ take `GET` operations (also known as HTTP _methods_).
* The _path_ `/items/{item_id}` has a _path parameter_ `item_id` that should be an `int`.