// there's another public super class which contains target method
                // it would be reported somewhere else
                return false
            }
        }

        // I'm the top public class which contains target method
        return true
    }

    private boolean containsMethod(CtClass c, CtMethod method) {

     * </p>
     */
    public DataSerializer() {
        kryoThreadLocal = ThreadLocal.withInitial(() -> {
            final Kryo kryo = new Kryo();
            // TODO use kryo.register for security
            // SECURITY WARNING: setRegistrationRequired(false) allows deserialization of arbitrary classes
            // which could potentially lead to remote code execution vulnerabilities.

     */
    protected void setupListCondition(final JobLogCB cb, final JobLogPager jobLogPager) {
        if (jobLogPager.id != null) {
            cb.query().docMeta().setId_Equal(jobLogPager.id);
        }
        // TODO Long, Integer, String supported only.

        // setup condition
        cb.query().addOrderBy_StartTime_Desc();
        cb.query().addOrderBy_EndTime_Desc();

        // search

    }

    /**

De esa manera, pude encontrar las mejores maneras de reducir la duplicación de código tanto como fuera posible, para tener autocompletado en todas partes, chequeos de tipos y errores, etc.

Todo de una manera que proporcionara la mejor experiencia de desarrollo para todos los desarrolladores.

## Requisitos { #requirements }

* **`300 - 399`** são para "Redirecionamento". As respostas com esses códigos de status podem ou não ter um corpo, exceto `304`, "Não modificado", que não deve ter um.
* **`400 - 499`** são para respostas de "Erro do cliente". Este é o segundo tipo que você provavelmente mais usaria.
    * Um exemplo é `404`, para uma resposta "Não encontrado".
    * Para erros genéricos do cliente, você pode usar apenas `400`.

import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;
import org.junit.Test;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
import org.junit.runners.Parameterized;
import org.junit.runners.Parameterized.Parameters;

@AndroidIncompatible
// TODO(cpovirk): Figure out Android JUnit 4 support. Does it work with Gingerbread? @RunWith?
@RunWith(Parameterized.class)
@NullUnmarked
public final class NetworkEquivalenceTest {
  private static final Integer N1 = 1;

 * Generates tests of all methods on a {@code CharSource} given various inputs the source is
 * expected to contain.
 *
 * @author Colin Decker
 */
@AndroidIncompatible // TODO(b/230620681): Make this available (even though we won't run it).
@NullUnmarked
public class CharSourceTester extends SourceSinkTester<CharSource, String, CharSourceFactory> {

    T[] result = newArray(arrayOfType, to - from);
    System.arraycopy(source, from, result, 0, to - from);
    return result;
  }

  // TODO(user): Move this logic to a utility class.
  @JsType(isNative = true, name = "Array", namespace = JsPackage.GLOBAL)
  private interface NativeArray {
    @JsProperty
    void setLength(int length);
  }

import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;
import org.junit.Test;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
import org.junit.runners.Parameterized;
import org.junit.runners.Parameterized.Parameters;

@AndroidIncompatible
// TODO(cpovirk): Figure out Android JUnit 4 support. Does it work with Gingerbread? @RunWith?
@RunWith(Parameterized.class)
@NullUnmarked
public final class NetworkEquivalenceTest {
  private static final Integer N1 = 1;

    checkHelperVersion(NO_ATOMIC_FIELD_UPDATER, "SynchronizedAtomicHelper");

    // Then, run the actual tests under each alternative classloader:

    runTestMethod(NO_ATOMIC_FIELD_UPDATER);
    // TODO(lukes): assert that the logs are full of errors
  }

  /**
   * Runs the corresponding {@link FuturesTest} test method in a new classloader that disallows
   * certain core JDK classes.
   */