* {@code Nullable}, {@code CheckForNull}, {@code NullableType}, or {@code NullableDecl}.
 *
 * <p>The tested methods and constructors are invoked -- each time with one parameter being null and
 * the rest not null -- and the test fails if no expected exception is thrown. {@code
 * NullPointerTester} uses best effort to pick non-null default values for many common JDK and Guava

   *
   * @since 14.0
   */
  public static long mean(long x, long y) {
    // Efficient method for computing the arithmetic mean.
    // The alternative (x + y) / 2 fails for large values.
    // The alternative (x + y) >>> 1 fails for negative values.
    return (x & y) + ((x ^ y) >> 1);
  }

  /*
   * This bitmask is used as an optimization for cheaply testing for divisibility by 2, 3, or 5.

 * character}, fixed {@linkplain #on(String) string}, {@linkplain #onPattern regular expression} or
 * {@link #on(CharMatcher) CharMatcher} instance. Or, instead of using a separator at all, a
 * splitter can extract adjacent substrings of a given {@linkplain #fixedLength fixed length}.
 *
 * <p>For example, this expression:
 *
 * <pre>{@code

   * other}. For example, the span of {@code [1..3]} and {@code (5..7)} is {@code [1..7)}.
   *
   * <p><i>If</i> the input ranges are {@linkplain #isConnected connected}, the returned range can
   * also be called their <i>union</i>. If they are not, note that the span might contain values
   * that are not contained in either input range.
   *

   * collection's {@code add()} and {@code addAll()} methods throw an {@link
   * IllegalArgumentException}. When methods such as {@code removeAll()} and {@code clear()} are
   * called on the filtered collection, only elements that satisfy the filter will be removed from
   * the underlying collection.
   *
   * <p>The returned collection isn't threadsafe or serializable, even if {@code unfiltered} is.
   *

  /**
   * Returns an iterator that cycles indefinitely over the elements of {@code iterable}.
   *
   * <p>The returned iterator supports {@code remove()} if the provided iterator does. After {@code
   * remove()} is called, subsequent cycles omit the removed element, which is no longer in {@code
   * iterable}. The iterator's {@code hasNext()} method returns {@code true} until {@code iterable}
   * is empty.
   *

class Http2Test {
  val frame = Buffer()
  val reader = Http2Reader(frame, false)
  val expectedStreamId = 15

  @Test fun unknownFrameTypeSkipped() {
    writeMedium(frame, 4) // has a 4-byte field
    frame.writeByte(99) // type 99
    frame.writeByte(FLAG_NONE)
    frame.writeInt(expectedStreamId)
    frame.writeInt(111111111) // custom data

 *       allocating garbage).
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>Disadvantages compared to {@code int[]}:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>Memory footprint has a fixed overhead (about 24 bytes per instance).
 *   <li><i>Some</i> construction use cases force the data to be copied (though several construction
 *       APIs are offered that don't).

 * which is optimal, and <i>not</i> the size of the internal hashtable, which could be much larger
 * than {@code size()}. Furthermore, this structure only depends on a fixed number of arrays; {@code
 * add(x)} operations <i>do not</i> create objects for the garbage collector to deal with, and for
 * every element added, the garbage collector will have to traverse {@code 1.5} references on

   * order</i>.
   *
   * <p>The iterator is <i>fail-fast</i>: If the MinMaxPriorityQueue is modified at any time after
   * the iterator is created, in any way except through the iterator's own remove method, the
   * iterator will generally throw a {@link ConcurrentModificationException}. Thus, in the face of
   * concurrent modification, the iterator fails quickly and cleanly, rather than risking arbitrary,