Klaus Post <******@****.***> 1759093161 +0200

P256 DATA p256mul<>+0x20(SB)/8, $0x1c1d1e1f00000000 // SEL d0 0 0 d0 DATA p256mul<>+0x28(SB)/8, $0x000000001c1d1e1f // SEL d0 0 0 d0 DATA p256mul<>+0x30(SB)/8, $0x0001020304050607 // SEL d0 0 d1 d0 DATA p256mul<>+0x38(SB)/8, $0x1c1d1e1f0c0d0e0f // SEL d0 0 d1 d0 DATA p256mul<>+0x40(SB)/8, $0x040506071c1d1e1f // SEL 0 d1 d0 d1 DATA p256mul<>+0x48(SB)/8, $0x0c0d0e0f1c1d1e1f // SEL 0 d1 d0 d1 DATA p256mul<>+0x50(SB)/8, $0x0405060704050607 // SEL 0 0 d1 d0 DATA p256mul<>+0x58(SB)/8, $0x1c1d1e1f0c0d0e0f...

Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:

   * permits? As explained above, there is no unique answer. If we are primarily interested to deal
   * with underutilization, then we want stored permits to be given out /faster/ than fresh ones,
   * because underutilization = free resources for the taking. If we are primarily interested to
   * deal with overflow, then stored permits could be given out /slower/ than fresh ones. Thus, we

Klaus Post <******@****.***> 1759093161 +0200

 *
 * Note: This is a skeleton implementation. A real implementation would
 * require proper DiSNI integration with actual RDMA hardware.
 */
public class DisniRdmaConnection extends RdmaConnection {

    private static final Logger log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(DisniRdmaConnection.class);

    // DiSNI objects - would be actual DiSNI types in real implementation
    private final Object endpoint; // RdmaActiveEndpoint

						tillOffset, DefaultBitrotAlgorithm, erasure.ShardSize())
				}
			}

			// Heal each part. erasure.Heal() will write the healed
			// part to .minio/tmp/uuid/ which needs to be renamed
			// later to the final location.
			err = erasure.Heal(ctx, writers, readers, partSize, prefer)
			closeBitrotReaders(readers)
			closeErrs := closeBitrotWriters(writers)
			if err != nil {

		},
		config.HelpKV{
			Key:         Sleep,
			Description: `maximum sleep duration between objects to slow down heal operation` + defaultHelpPostfix(Sleep),
			Optional:    true,
			Type:        "duration",
		},
		config.HelpKV{
			Key:         IOCount,
			Description: `maximum IO requests allowed between objects to slow down heal operation` + defaultHelpPostfix(IOCount),
			Optional:    true,
			Type:        "int",
		},
		config.HelpKV{

		n, err := rc.Read(data[:])
		if err != nil {
			return err
		}
		if n != len(data) {
			return errors.New("heal mrf: no data")
		}
		// Read resync meta header
		switch binary.LittleEndian.Uint16(data[0:2]) {
		case healMRFMetaFormat:
		default:
			return fmt.Errorf("heal mrf: unknown format: %d", binary.LittleEndian.Uint16(data[0:2]))
		}
		switch binary.LittleEndian.Uint16(data[2:4]) {

        Did you *actually* encounter the need for this enhancement in a real-world scenario, or does
        it just seem like a sensible behavior for the feature to have?


        Before we make significant changes to existing features in Guava, we really want to be sure
        that it's for a use case that actually comes up in the real world. We want to hear the