Thread.interrupted();
            if (interruptingThread.isAlive()) {
              // This will be hidden by test-output redirection:
              logger.severe("InterruptenatorTask did not exit; future tests may be affected");
              /*
               * This won't do any good under JUnit 3, but I'll leave it around in
               * case we ever switch to JUnit 4:
               */

    compiling from source placeholder: validations: required: false

-   type: textarea id: what-happened attributes: label: Current Behaviour?
    description: Also tell us, what did you expect to happen? placeholder: Tell
    us what you see! value: "A bug happened!" render: shell validations:
    required: true

-   type: textarea id: code-to-reproduce attributes: label: Standalone code to

            if (log.isTraceEnabled()) {
                log.trace("Returned from NtTransNotifyChange " + resp.getErrorCode());
            }

            if (!resp.isReceived()) {
                throw new CIFSException("Did not receive response");
            }

            if (resp.getErrorCode() == 0x10B) {
                this.handle.markClosed();
            }
            if (resp.getErrorCode() == 0x10C) {

    attributes:
      label: Desired Behavior
      description: What do you want it to do instead?
    validations:
      required: true

  - type: markdown
    attributes:
      value: >
        Did you *actually* encounter the need for this enhancement in a real-world scenario, or does
        it just seem like a sensible behavior for the feature to have?

    * You wouldn't write an application in Uvicorn directly. That would mean that your code would have to include more or less, at least, all the code provided by Starlette (or **FastAPI**). And if you did that, your final application would have the same overhead as having used a framework and minimizing your app code and bugs.
    * If you are comparing Uvicorn, compare it against Daphne, Hypercorn, uWSGI, etc. Application servers.

     */
    int DCERPC_RESERVED_1 = 0x08;
    /**
     * Supports concurrent multiplexing flag.
     */
    int DCERPC_CONC_MPX = 0x10; /* supports concurrent multiplexing */
    /**
     * Did not execute flag - indicates request was not executed
     */
    int DCERPC_DID_NOT_EXECUTE = 0x20;
    /**
     * Maybe flag - indicates 'maybe' call semantics requested
     */

            Thread.interrupted();
            if (interruptingThread.isAlive()) {
              // This will be hidden by test-output redirection:
              logger.severe("InterruptenatorTask did not exit; future tests may be affected");
              /*
               * This won't do any good under JUnit 3, but I'll leave it around in
               * case we ever switch to JUnit 4:
               */

 *
 * As a non-default component this now gets a negative priority relative to other implementations
 * of the same interface. Since we want to allow overriding this doesn't matter in this case.
 * (if it did we could add @Priority of 0 to match the priority given to default components.)
 *
 * @deprecated use {@code org.apache.maven.api.services.ModelBuilder} instead
 */
@Named("core-default")
@Singleton

		"bytes=+3-+5",
		"bytes=10-11,12-10", // Unsupported by S3/MinIO (valid in RFC)
	}
	for i, urs := range unparsableRangeSpecs {
		rs, err := parseRequestRangeSpec(urs)
		if err == nil {
			t.Errorf("Case %d: Did not get an expected error - got %v", i, rs)
		}
		if isErrInvalidRange(err) {
			t.Errorf("Case %d: Got invalid range error instead of a parse error", i)
		}
		if rs != nil {

      assertWithMessage(error).that(error).isNull();
    }
    executor.shutdown();
  }

  /**
   * He did the bash, he did the future bash The future bash, it was a concurrency smash He did the
   * bash, it caught on in a flash He did the bash, he did the future bash
   */

  public void testFutureBash() {
    if (isWindows()) {