//   system scheduling and as such we could either miss our deadline, or unpark() could be delayed
  //   so that it looks like we timed out even though we didn't. For comparison FutureTask respects
  //   completion preferably and AQS is non-deterministic (depends on where in the queue the waiter
  //   is). If we wanted to be strict about it, we could store the unpark() time in the Waiter node

                        logger.warn("Could not close a process input stream.", e);
                    }
                });
                CommonPoolUtil.execute(() -> {
                    try {
                        CloseableUtil.closeQuietly(p.getErrorStream());
                    } catch (final Exception e) {
                        logger.warn("Could not close a process error stream.", e);
                    }

            return parse(new GZIPInputStream(bis), false);
        } catch (final CrawlingAccessException e) {
            throw e;
        } catch (final Exception e) {
            throw new CrawlingAccessException("Could not parse Sitemaps: " + preloadDate, e);
        }
    }

    /**
     * Parses a text-based sitemap from the given input stream.
     * @param in the input stream to parse
     * @return the parsed sitemap set

In this case, we pass a dependency function `get_current_active_user` to `Security` (the same way we would do with `Depends`).

But we also pass a `list` of scopes, in this case with just one scope: `items` (it could have more).

     *
     * - Any kind of Error from a listener. Even if we could distinguish that case (by exposing some
     * extra state from AbstractFuture), our options are limited: A call to setException() would be
     * a no-op. We could log, but if that's what we really want, we should modify
     * AbstractFuture.executeListener to do so, since that method would have the ability to continue
     * to execute other listeners.
     *

        super("The POM expression: " + expression + " could not be evaluated. Reason: " + message, cause);

        this.expression = expression;
        this.originalMessage = message;
    }

    public ModelInterpolationException(String expression, String message) {
        super("The POM expression: " + expression + " could not be evaluated. Reason: " + message);

        this.expression = expression;

	"github.com/minio/pkg/v3/sys"
)

func oldLinux() bool {
	currentKernel, err := kernel.CurrentVersion()
	if err != nil {
		// Could not probe the kernel version
		return false
	}

	if currentKernel == 0 {
		// We could not get any valid value return false
		return false
	}

	// legacy linux indicator for printing warnings
	// about older Linux kernels and Go runtime.

    /*
     * In principle, a Multimap implementation could add e3 first before failing on the null. But
     * that seems unlikely enough to be worth complicating the test over, especially if there's any
     * chance that a permissive test could mask a bug.
     */
    expectUnchanged();
    // Be extra thorough in case internal state was corrupted by the expected null.

ECL0105=Rethrew {0} as a runtime exception.
ECL0106=IOException occurred, because {0}
ECL0107=InvalidKeyException occurred, because {0}
ECL0108=The path is null.
ECL0109=Could not create a parent directory of {0}
ECL0110=A parent directory of {0} is not a directory.
ECL0111={0} is not a file.
ECL0112=Could not store {0}
ECL0113=NoSuchPaddingException occurred, because {0}
ECL0114=NoSuchAlgorithmException occurred, because {0}

    expected.addAll(index, elements);
    expectContents(expected);
  }

  /*
   * TODO: if we're testing a list, we could check indexOf(). (Doing it in
   * AbstractListTester isn't enough because many tests that run on lists don't
   * extends AbstractListTester.) We could also iterate over all elements to
   * verify absence
   */
  protected void expectMissing(E... elements) {
    for (E element : elements) {