protected DialectVersion maxVersion;
    protected boolean requireSecureNegotiate = true;
    protected boolean sendNTLMTargetName = true;
    private byte[] machineId;
    protected String guestUsername = "GUEST";
    protected String guestPassword = "";
    protected boolean allowGuestFallback = false;


    /**
     * @throws CIFSException
     * 
     */

    public static final String PROCESS_TYPE_BOTH = "B";

    public static final long ONE_DAY_IN_MILLIS = 24L * 60L * 60L * 1000L;

    public static final String GUEST_USER = "guest";

    public static final String[] PAGER_CONVERSION_RULE =
            { "allRecordCount", "pageSize", "currentPageNumber", "allPageCount", "existPrePage", "existNextPage" };

    // crawler types

```

But by using the `secrets.compare_digest()` it will be secure against a type of attacks called "timing attacks".

### Timing Attacks

But what's a "timing attack"?

Let's imagine some attackers are trying to guess the username and password.

And they send a request with a username `johndoe` and a password `love123`.

Then the Python code in your application would be equivalent to something like:

```Python

    /** The key of the configuration. e.g. {role}guest */
    String ROLE_SEARCH_DEFAULT_DISPLAY_PERMISSIONS = "role.search.default.display.permissions";

    /** The key of the configuration. e.g. {role}guest */
    String ROLE_SEARCH_GUEST_PERMISSIONS = "role.search.guest.permissions";

    /** The key of the configuration. e.g. 1 */

    public <T extends Address> T unwrap ( Class<T> type ) {
        if ( type.isAssignableFrom(this.getClass()) ) {
            return (T) this;
        }
        return null;
    }


    /**
     * Guess next called name to try for session establishment. These
     * methods are used by the smb package.
     * 
     * @return guessed name
     */
    @Override
    public String firstCalledName () {

### 2. Configure WSO2

Once WSO2 is up and running, configure WSO2 to generate Self contained id_tokens. In OAuth 2.0 specification there are primarily two ways to provide id_tokens

1. The id_token is an identifier that is hard to guess. For example, a randomly generated string of sufficient length, that the server handling the protected resource can use to lookup the associated authorization information.

			return "", "", err
		}

		host = addr

		switch scheme {
		case "https":
			port = "443"
		case "http":
			port = "80"
		default:
			return "", "", errors.New("unable to guess port from scheme")
		}
	}

	return host, port, nil
}

// isLocalHost - checks if the given parameter
// correspond to one of the local IP of the
// current machine

         * layer of fallback before consulting the system property, we could try
         * com.sun.security.auth.module.NTSystem.
         *
         * But for now, we use the value from the system property as our best guess.
         */
        return fromSystemProperty;
      } catch (InvocationTargetException e) {
        throwIfUnchecked(e.getCause()); // in case it's an Error or something

version IDs, and they can't be edited. Version IDs are simply of `DCE 1.1 v4 UUID 4` (random data based), UUIDs are 128 bit numbers which are intended to have a high likelihood of uniqueness over space and time and are computationally difficult to guess. They are globally unique identifiers which can be locally generated without contacting a global registration authority. UUIDs are intended as unique identifiers for both mass tagging objects with an extremely short lifetime and to reliably identifying...

   *
   * <p><b>Performance note:</b> When feasible, {@code initialCapacity} should be the exact number
   * of values that will be added, if that knowledge is readily available. It is better to guess a
   * value slightly too high than slightly too low. If the value is not exact, the {@link
   * ImmutableLongArray} that is built will very likely occupy more memory than strictly necessary;