public MavenExecutionPlan calculateExecutionPlan(MavenSession session, boolean setup, String... tasks) {
        return new MavenExecutionPlan(null, new DefaultLifecycles());
    }

    @Override
    public void execute(MavenSession session) {}

    @Override
    public Set<Plugin> getPluginsBoundByDefaultToAllLifecycles(String packaging) {
        Set<Plugin> plugins;

Neste caso, ela será montada no caminho `/subapi`:

{* ../../docs_src/sub_applications/tutorial001.py hl[11,19] *}

### Verifique a documentação automática da API

Agora, execute `uvicorn` com a aplicação principal, se o seu arquivo for `main.py`, seria:

<div class="termy">

```console
$ uvicorn main:app --reload

* Construisez votre image FastAPI :

<div class="termy">

```console
$ docker build -t myimage .

---> 100%
```

</div>

## Démarrer le conteneur Docker

* Exécutez un conteneur basé sur votre image :

<div class="termy">

```console
$ docker run -d --name mycontainer -p 80:80 myimage
```

</div>

      .url("https://api.imgur.com/3/image")
      .post(new ProgressRequestBody(requestBody, progressListener))
      .build();

    Response response = client.newCall(request).execute();
    if (!response.isSuccessful()) throw new IOException("Unexpected code " + response);

    System.out.println(response.body().string());
  }

  public static void main(String... args) throws Exception {

Якщо Ви зайдете до **інтерфейсу документації API** за адресою `/docs`, Ви зможете побачити **документацію** для cookie у Ваших **операціях шляху**.

Але навіть якщо Ви заповните дані й натиснете "Execute", оскільки інтерфейс документації працює з **JavaScript**, cookie не будуть відправлені, і Ви побачите **помилку**, ніби Ви не ввели жодних значень.

///

## Заборона додаткових cookie

    method.setAccessible(true);

    this.executor = bus.executor();
  }

  /** Dispatches {@code event} to this subscriber using the proper executor. */
  final void dispatchEvent(Object event) {
    executor.execute(
        () -> {
          try {
            invokeSubscriberMethod(event);
          } catch (InvocationTargetException e) {
            bus.handleSubscriberException(e.getCause(), context(event));
          }

    @Override
    protected String getQueryClassName() {
        return PhraseQuery.class.getSimpleName();
    }

    @Override
    public QueryBuilder execute(final QueryContext context, final Query query, final float boost) {
        if (query instanceof final PhraseQuery phraseQuery) {
            if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
                logger.debug("{}:{}", query, boost);

If you go to the **API docs UI** at `/docs` you will be able to see the **documentation** for cookies for your *path operations*.

But even if you **fill the data** and click "Execute", because the docs UI works with **JavaScript**, the cookies won't be sent, and you will see an **error** message as if you didn't write any values.

///

## Forbid Extra Cookies { #forbid-extra-cookies }

  private void sendRequest(OkHttpClient client, String url) throws IOException {
    Request request = new Request.Builder()
            .url(url)
            .build();
    try (Response response = client.newCall(request).execute()) {
      assertTrue(response.code() == 200 || response.code() == 404);
      assertEquals(Protocol.HTTP_2, response.protocol());
    }
  }

* **Starlette**:
    * Will have the next best performance, after Uvicorn. In fact, Starlette uses Uvicorn to run. So, it probably can only get "slower" than Uvicorn by having to execute more code.
    * But it provides you the tools to build simple web applications, with routing based on paths, etc.
    * If you are comparing Starlette, compare it against Sanic, Flask, Django, etc. Web frameworks (or microframeworks).