* response body is [closed][ResponseBody]. The recipient of the callback may consume the response
   * body on another thread.
   *
   * Note that transport-layer success (receiving a HTTP response code, headers and body) does not
   * necessarily indicate application-layer success: `response` may still indicate an unhappy HTTP
   * response code like 404 or 500.
   */
  @Throws(IOException::class)
  fun onResponse(
    call: Call,

import java.util.logging.Logger;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullMarked;

/**
 * Simple utility for when you want to create a {@link TearDown} that may throw an exception but
 * should not fail a test when it does. (The behavior of a {@code TearDown} that throws an exception
 * varies; see its documentation for details.) Use it just like a {@code TearDown}, except override
 * {@link #sloppyTearDown()} instead.
 *

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages
    have prod supersource, even if they have none. GWT is happy to ignore us
    when we specify a nonexistent path.

    (I hope that this workaround does not cause its own problems in the future.)
-->
<super-source path="super"/>

<inherits name="com.google.common.annotations.Annotations" />
<inherits name="com.google.gwt.core.Core" />

 *
 * @since 4.0.0
 */
@Experimental
public interface Parser {
    /**
     * Parses the given ParserRequest to create an {@link InvokerRequest}.
     * This method does interpret tool arguments.
     *
     * @param parserRequest the request containing all necessary information for parsing

            url = "file://" + url.substring("file:".length());
        }

        // So now we have an url of the form file://<path>

        // We want to eliminate any relative path nonsense and lock down the path so we
        // need to fully resolve it before any submodules use the path. This can happen
        // when you are using a custom settings.xml that contains a relative path entry

            throws ArtifactResolutionException {
        fireEvent(ResolutionListener.TEST_ARTIFACT, listeners, node);

        Object key = node.getKey();

        // TODO Does this check need to happen here? Had to add the same call
        // below when we iterate on child nodes -- will that suffice?
        if (managedVersions.containsKey(key)) {

     *
     * @return an array of FileEntry objects representing the shares
     */
    public FileEntry[] getEntries() {
        /*
         * The ShareInfo1 class does not implement the FileEntry
         * interface (because it is generated from IDL). Therefore
         * we must create an array of objects that do.
         */

     * Returns the share entries retrieved from the enumeration.
     *
     * @return an array of FileEntry objects representing the shares
     */
    public FileEntry[] getEntries() {
        /* The ShareInfo1 class does not implement the FileEntry
         * interface (because it is generated from IDL). Therefore
         * we must create an array of objects that do.
         */

	disks := er.getDisks()
	var wg sync.WaitGroup
	var mu sync.Mutex
	r := rand.New(rand.NewSource(time.Now().UnixNano()))
	for _, i := range r.Perm(len(disks)) {
		wg.Add(1)
		go func() {
			defer wg.Done()
			if disks[i] == nil {
				return
			}
			di, err := disks[i].DiskInfo(context.Background(), DiskInfoOptions{})
			if err != nil || di.Healing {
				// - Do not consume disks which are not reachable

# to the container, and would result in C:\<path> != T:\<path> mismatches,
# when using variables like `TFCI_OUTPUT_DIR` in `docker exec commands,
# requiring conditional path adjustments throughout the CI scripts.
# Note: This does not work for `docker cp` commands.
# For a little more detail, see:
# https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/cc3006af6fea8d2a1360b3b5e65f9d14bbdb7094/ci/devinfra/docker/windows2022/Dockerfile#L196