response, err = s.client.Do(request)
	c.Assert(err, nil)
	// Assert if the content-type header set during the object upload persists.
	c.Assert(response.Header.Get("Content-Type"), "application/json")

	// Fetch the object and assert whether the Content-Type header persists.
	request, err = newTestSignedRequest(http.MethodGet, getGetObjectURL(s.endPoint, bucketName, objectName),
		0, nil, s.accessKey, s.secretKey, s.signer)

labels.config_parameter=Parâmetro de configuração
labels.max_access_count=Número máximo de acessos
labels.number_of_thread=Número de threads
labels.interval_time=Intervalo
labels.millisec=milissegundos
labels.permissions=Permissões
labels.virtual_hosts=Hosts virtuais
labels.virtual_host=Host virtual
labels.label_type=Rótulo
labels.file_crawling_button_create=Criar
labels.file_crawling_button_create_job=Criar novo trabalho

<img class="shadow" src="/img/deployment/concepts/image01.png">

---

Ahora que conocemos la diferencia entre los términos **proceso** y **programa**, sigamos hablando sobre implementaciones.

## Ejecución al Iniciar

 *  Fix: Timeouts throw `SocketTimeoutException`, not `InterruptedIOException`.
 *  Fix: Change `MockWebServer` to use the same logic as OkHttp when determining
    whether an HTTP request permits a body.
 *  Fix: `HttpUrl` now uses the canonical form for IPv6 addresses.
 *  Fix: Use `HttpUrl` internally.
 *  Fix: Recover from Android 4.2.2 EBADF crashes.

       * seen value. And while we *could* do that, we aren't required to: Map.Entry explicitly says
       * that behavior is undefined when the backing map is modified through another API. (It even
       * permits us to throw IllegalStateException. Maybe we should have done that, but we probably
       * shouldn't change now for fear of breaking people.)
       *

* <a href="https://github.com/esnme/ultrajson" target="_blank"><code>ujson</code></a> - Requerido si deseas usar `UJSONResponse`.

## Licencia

       * seen value. And while we *could* do that, we aren't required to: Map.Entry explicitly says
       * that behavior is undefined when the backing map is modified through another API. (It even
       * permits us to throw IllegalStateException. Maybe we should have done that, but we probably
       * shouldn't change now for fear of breaking people.)
       */
      return (lastKnownIndex == -1) ? unsafeNull() : value(lastKnownIndex);

       * seen value. And while we *could* do that, we aren't required to: Map.Entry explicitly says
       * that behavior is undefined when the backing map is modified through another API. (It even
       * permits us to throw IllegalStateException. Maybe we should have done that, but we probably
       * shouldn't change now for fear of breaking people.)
       */
      return (lastKnownIndex == -1) ? unsafeNull() : value(lastKnownIndex);

   * to thread contention. But overestimates and underestimates within an order of magnitude do not
   * usually have much noticeable impact. A value of one permits only one thread to modify the cache
   * at a time, but since read operations and cache loading computations can proceed concurrently,
   * this still yields higher concurrency than full synchronization.
   *

     * nullness annotations in ImmutableMap and those in its own Map type. In response, it considers
     * the parameter and return type both to be platform types. As a result, Kotlin permits calls
     * that can lead to NullPointerException. That's unfortunate. But hopefully most Kotlin callers
     * use `get(key) ?: defaultValue` instead of this method, anyway.
     */
    V result = get(key);