## Proxy with a stripped path prefix

Having a proxy with a stripped path prefix, in this case, means that you could declare a path at `/app` in your code, but then, you add a layer on top (the proxy) that would put your **FastAPI** application under a path like `/api/v1`.

In this case, the original path `/app` would actually be served at `/api/v1/app`.

Even though all your code is written assuming there's just `/app`.

     * implement Function<A, B>, as discussed in a class-level comment), it would make some sense to
     * perform runtime null checks on the input and output. (That would also make NullPointerTester
     * happy!) However, since we didn't do that for many years, we're not about to start now.
     * (Runtime checks could be particularly bad for users of LegacyConverter.)
     *

You could load it at the top level of the module/file, but that would also mean that it would **load the model** even if you are just running a simple automated test, then that test would be **slow** because it would have to wait for the model to load before being able to run an independent part of the code.

	log.Debug("removing host iptables rules")
	s.hostIptables.DeleteHostRules()

	log.Debug("destroying host ipset")
	s.hostsideProbeIPSet.Flush()
	if err := s.hostsideProbeIPSet.DestroySet(); err != nil {
		log.Warnf("could not destroy host ipset on shutdown")
	}

	s.netServer.Stop()
}

func (s *meshDataplane) ConstructInitialSnapshot(ambientPods []*corev1.Pod) error {
	if err := s.syncHostIPSets(ambientPods); err != nil {

For example, you could want to **return a dictionary** or a database object, but **declare it as a Pydantic model**. This way the Pydantic model would do all the data documentation, validation, etc. for the object that you returned (e.g. a dictionary or database object).

     *
     * - Any kind of Error from a listener. Even if we could distinguish that case (by exposing some
     * extra state from AbstractFuture), our options are limited: A call to setException() would be
     * a no-op. We could log, but if that's what we really want, we should modify
     * AbstractFuture.executeListener to do so, since that method would have the ability to continue
     * to execute other listeners.
     *

│   └── main.py
```

In the file `main.py` you have your **FastAPI** app:


```Python
{!../../docs_src/app_testing/main.py!}
```

### Testing file

Then you could have a file `test_main.py` with your tests. It could live on the same Python package (the same directory with a `__init__.py` file):

``` hl_lines="5"
.
├── app
│   ├── __init__.py
│   ├── main.py
│   └── test_main.py
```

### Import `APIRouter`

You import it and create an "instance" the same way you would with the class `FastAPI`:

```Python hl_lines="1  3" title="app/routers/users.py"
{!../../docs_src/bigger_applications/app/routers/users.py!}
```

### *Path operations* with `APIRouter`

And then you use it to declare your *path operations*.

Use it the same way you would use the `FastAPI` class:

It would also mean that if you get data from the `Request` object directly (for example, read the body) it won't be validated, converted or documented (with OpenAPI, for the automatic API user interface) by FastAPI.

Although any other parameter declared normally (for example, the body with a Pydantic model) would still be validated, converted, annotated, etc.

 * @since 12.0
 */
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
/*
 * A nullable bound would let users create a TypeParameter instance for a parameter with a nullable
 * bound. However, it would also let them create `new TypeParameter<@Nullable T>() {}`, which
 * wouldn't behave as users might expect. Additionally, it's not clear how the TypeToken API could
 * support even a "normal" `TypeParameter<T>` when `<T>` has a nullable bound. (See the discussion