disjoint = new Target(disjointList, "disjoint");
    superset = new Target(MinimalCollection.of(e0(), e1(), e2(), e3(), e4()), "superset");
    nonEmptyProperSubset = new Target(MinimalCollection.of(e1()), "subset");
    sameElements = new Target(asList(createSamplesArray()), "sameElements");
    containsDuplicates =
        new Target(MinimalCollection.of(e0(), e0(), e3(), e3()), "containsDuplicates");

  public void testRetainAll_duplicatesRemoved() {
    E[] array = createSamplesArray();
    array[1] = e0();
    collection = getSubjectGenerator().create(array);
    assertTrue(
        "containsDuplicates.retainAll(subset) should return true",
        collection.retainAll(MinimalCollection.of(e2())));
    expectContents(e2());
  }

  @CollectionFeature.Require(SUPPORTS_REMOVE)
  @CollectionSize.Require(SEVERAL)

 * but was not itself a public suffix. However, this test is no longer accurate. There are many
 * domains which are both public suffixes and addressable as hosts; {@code "uk.com"} is one example.
 * Using the subset of public suffixes that are {@linkplain #isRegistrySuffix() registry suffixes},
 * one can get a better result, as only a few registry suffixes are addressable. However, the most

 *   <li>remove();
 *   <li>next();
 * </ol>
 *
 * <p>This particular order of operations may be unrealistic, and testing all 3^5 of them may be
 * thought of as overkill; however, it's difficult to determine which proper subset of this massive
 * set would be sufficient to expose any possible bug. Brute force is simpler.
 *
 * <p>To use this class the concrete subclass must implement the {@link

[Java style guide]: https://google.github.io/styleguide/javaguide.html
[well-formed commit message]: https://tbaggery.com/2008/04/19/a-note-about-git-commit-messages.html

#### Merging pull requests ####

Due to Guava's nature as a subset of Google's internal codebase which is
automatically synced to the public GitHub repository, we are unable to merge
pull requests directly into the master branch. Instead, once a pull request is

 *   <li>remove();
 *   <li>next();
 * </ol>
 *
 * <p>This particular order of operations may be unrealistic, and testing all 3^5 of them may be
 * thought of as overkill; however, it's difficult to determine which proper subset of this massive
 * set would be sufficient to expose any possible bug. Brute force is simpler.
 *
 * <p>To use this class the concrete subclass must implement the {@link

  private static long fingerprint(byte[] bytes) {
    return fingerprint(bytes, bytes.length);
  }

  /** Convenience method to compute a fingerprint on a subset of a byte array. */
  private static long fingerprint(byte[] bytes, int length) {
    return HASH_FN.hashBytes(bytes, 0, length).asLong();
  }

  /**

    assertEquals(Sets.<@Nullable String>newHashSet(null, "tree"), keySet.headSet("yahoo"));
    assertEquals(newHashSet("google"), keySet.tailSet("yahoo"));
    assertEquals(newHashSet("tree"), keySet.subSet("ask", "yahoo"));
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // SerializableTester
  public void testExplicitComparatorSerialization() {
    TreeMultimap<@Nullable String, @Nullable Integer> multimap = createPopulate();

@Beta
public final class Graphs extends GraphsBridgeMethods {

  private Graphs() {}

  // Graph query methods

  /**
   * Returns true if {@code graph} has at least one cycle. A cycle is defined as a non-empty subset
   * of edges in a graph arranged to form a path (a sequence of adjacent outgoing edges) starting
   * and ending with the same node.
   *

@Beta
public final class Graphs extends GraphsBridgeMethods {

  private Graphs() {}

  // Graph query methods

  /**
   * Returns true if {@code graph} has at least one cycle. A cycle is defined as a non-empty subset
   * of edges in a graph arranged to form a path (a sequence of adjacent outgoing edges) starting
   * and ending with the same node.
   *