fi

# Check if size is too big. TFCI_WHL_SIZE_LIMIT is in find's format, which can be
# 'k' for kilobytes, 'M' for megabytes, or 'G' for gigabytes, and the + to indicate
# "anything greater than" is added by the script.
if [[ "$TFCI_WHL_SIZE_LIMIT_ENABLE" == "1" ]] && [[ -n "$("$TFCI_FIND_BIN" . -iname "*.whl" -size "+$TFCI_WHL_SIZE_LIMIT")" ]]; then
  echo "Error: Generated wheel is too big! Limit is $TFCI_WHL_SIZE_LIMIT"

@SuppressWarnings("JUnit4ClassUsedInJUnit3")
public abstract class AbstractMultisetSetCountTester<E> extends AbstractMultisetTester<E> {
  /*
   * TODO: consider adding MultisetFeatures.SUPPORTS_SET_COUNT. Currently we
   * assume that using setCount() to increase the count is permitted iff add()
   * is permitted and similarly for decrease/remove(). We assume that a

 */
@SuppressWarnings("rawtypes") // https://github.com/google/guava/issues/989
@DoNotMock("Use ImmutableRangeMap or TreeRangeMap")
@GwtIncompatible
public interface RangeMap<K extends Comparable, V> {
  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): These docs sometimes say "map" and sometimes say "range map." Pick one, or at
   * least decide on a policy for when to use which.
   */

  /**

	MOVWZ $-2147483648, R5          // 3ca08000

	// TODO: These are preprocessed by the assembler into MOVD $const>>shift, R5; SLD $shift, R5.
	//       This only captures the MOVD. Should the SLD be appended to the encoding by the test?
	// Hex constant 0x20004000000
	MOVD $2199090364416, R5         // 60058001
	// Hex constant 0xFFFFFE0004000000
	MOVD $-2198956146688, R5        // 38a08001

### Go command {#go-command}

`go test` now invokes the stdversion vet check by default.
This reports the use of standard library symbols that are too new
for the Go version in force in the referring file,
as determined by `go` directive in `go.mod` and build tags on the file.

      @Override
      public Integer apply(Integer from) {
        if (++calls > 1) {
          fail();
        }
        throw new SomeError();
      }
    };
  }

  // TODO(cpovirk): top-level class?
  static class ExecutorSpy implements Executor {

    Executor delegate;
    boolean wasExecuted;

    public ExecutorSpy(Executor delegate) {
      this.delegate = delegate;
    }

      @Override
      public Integer apply(Integer from) {
        if (++calls > 1) {
          fail();
        }
        throw new SomeError();
      }
    };
  }

  // TODO(cpovirk): top-level class?
  static class ExecutorSpy implements Executor {

    Executor delegate;
    boolean wasExecuted;

    public ExecutorSpy(Executor delegate) {
      this.delegate = delegate;
    }

      }

      @Override
      public int hashCode() {
        return 1;
      }
    }
  }

  private static void assertContains(String expectedSubstring, String actual) {
    // TODO(kevinb): use a Truth assertion here
    if (!actual.contains(expectedSubstring)) {
      fail("expected <" + actual + "> to contain <" + expectedSubstring + ">");
    }
  }

   * data written to it to the underlying {@link OutputStream}.
   *
   * <p>The {@link OutputStream} should not be written to before or after the hand-off.
   */
  // TODO(user): Evaluate whether it makes sense to always piggyback the computation of a
  // HashCode on an existing OutputStream, compared to creating a separate OutputStream that could

      }

      @Override
      public int hashCode() {
        return 1;
      }
    }
  }

  private static void assertContains(String expectedSubstring, String actual) {
    // TODO(kevinb): use a Truth assertion here
    if (!actual.contains(expectedSubstring)) {
      fail("expected <" + actual + "> to contain <" + expectedSubstring + ">");
    }
  }