<module>
<source path="">
  <!-- Hack to keep collect from hiding collect.testing supersource: -->
  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see

   * TODO(b/242884182): Figure out why this helps produce the same class file when we compile most
   * of common.collect a second time with the results of the first compilation on the classpath. Or
   * just back this out once we stop doing that (which we'll do after our internal GWT setup
   * changes).
   */
  @Override
  public ImmutableMap<Object, Collection<Object>> asMap() {
    return super.asMap();
  }

  private Object readResolve() {

        TransWaitNamedPipe pipe = new TransWaitNamedPipe("\\\\pipe\\testPipe");
        byte[] dst = new byte[10];

        // writeSetupWireFormat writes 4 bytes:
        // - subCommand byte
        // - 3 zero bytes (padding and no FID)
        int written = pipe.writeSetupWireFormat(dst, 0);

        assertEquals(4, written, "Setup should write 4 bytes");

<module>
<source path="">
  <!-- Hack to keep collect from hiding collect.testing supersource: -->
  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see

        That's a lot of work they are doing, but if more FastAPI users came to help others like them just a little bit more, it would be much less effort for them (and you and me 😅).

    public void testEncoding() {
        byte[] buffer = new byte[256];
        int encodedSize = context.encode(buffer, 0);

        assertTrue(encodedSize > 8); // Minimum size: count + padding + flags + algorithms
        assertEquals(context.size(), encodedSize);
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test context decoding")
    public void testDecoding() throws SMBProtocolDecodingException {

To remove a dependency

- Edit your code and remove the import reference.
- Run `go mod tidy` in the source folder to remove dependency from `go.mod` file.

### What are the coding guidelines for MinIO?

     * for (Lock lock : locks) {
     *   lock.unlock();
     * }
     *
     * If we only held the int[] stripes, translating it on the fly to L's, the original locks might
     * be garbage collected after locking them, ending up in a huge mess.
     */
    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // we carefully replaced all keys with their respective L's
    List<L> asStripes = (List<L>) result;
    return Collections.unmodifiableList(asStripes);
  }

This has been mostly done, but there remain a few holdouts (fixing these is out of scope).

To keep the Groovy DSL ergonomic, we generate methods as necessary from the non-Groovy equivalents.

Doing this provides the following specific benefits:
- **Reduce the API surface** - We no longer need to maintain two methods.
- **Consistency** - All languages have consistent access to the same APIs and ergonomics in the DSL.

nction(e,n){var i=n.style.paddingRight,a=o.default(n).css("padding-right");o.default(n).data("padding-right",i).css("padding-right",parseFloat(a)+t._scrollbarWidth+"px")})),o.default(n).each((function(e,n){var i=n.style.marginRight,a=o.default(n).css("margin-right");o.default(n).data("margin-right",i).css("margin-right",parseFloat(a)-t._scrollbarWidth+"px")}));var i=document.body.style.paddingRight,a=o.default(document.body).css("padding-right");o.default(document.body).data("padding-right",i).c...