netServerEnum2.writeParametersWireFormat(dst, 0);
        });
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test writeParametersWireFormat with large buffer succeeds")
    void testWriteParametersWireFormatLargeBuffer() {
        String domain = "DOMAIN";
        netServerEnum2 = new NetServerEnum2(realConfig, domain, NetServerEnum2.SV_TYPE_ALL);

    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("getSmbSession creates and then reuses matching session")
    void getSmbSession_createAndReuse() {
        // Arrange: minimal credentials chain so SmbSessionImpl constructor succeeds
        CredentialsInternal creds = mock(CredentialsInternal.class);
        when(ctx.getCredentials()).thenReturn(creds);
        when(creds.unwrap(CredentialsInternal.class)).thenReturn(creds);

        response.body.string()
      }
    }

    // The second call succeeds.
    val call2 = client.newCall(Request(server.url("/")))
    call2.execute().use { response ->
      assertThat(
        response.body.string(),
      ).isEqualTo("b")
    }

    // Calls succeed after the degraded pong timeout because the degraded pong was received.

     *
     * @return failure count
     */
    public int getFailureCount() {
        return failureCount.get();
    }

    /**
     * Get current success count (in HALF_OPEN state)
     *
     * @return success count
     */
    public int getSuccessCount() {
        return successCount.get();
    }

    /**
     * Get time since last state change
     *

  public static <V extends @Nullable Object> V getDone(Future<V> future) throws ExecutionException {
    /*
     * We throw IllegalStateException, since the call could succeed later. Perhaps we "should" throw
     * IllegalArgumentException, since the call could succeed with a different argument. Those
     * exceptions' docs suggest that either is acceptable. Google's Java Practices page recommends

 *
 * <h3>Warning about performance</h3>
 *
 * <p>Remember that parameter values for message construction must all be computed eagerly, and
 * autoboxing and varargs array creation may happen as well, even when the verification succeeds and
 * the message ends up unneeded. Performance-sensitive verification checks should continue to use
 * usual form:
 *
 * {@snippet :
 * Bill bill = remoteService.getLastUnpaidBill();

) {
	testCases := []struct {
		bucketName         string
		accessKey          string
		secretKey          string
		expectedRespStatus int
	}{
		// Test case - 1.
		// Validate a good case request succeeds.
		{
			bucketName:         bucketName,
			accessKey:          credentials.AccessKey,
			secretKey:          credentials.SecretKey,
			expectedRespStatus: http.StatusOK,
		},
		// Test case - 2.

   * creation and removal (including automatic removal of zeroes). If the modification of an
   * AtomicInteger results in zero, we compareAndSet the value to zero; if that succeeds, we remove
   * the entry from the Map. If another operation sees a zero in the map, it knows that the entry is
   * about to be removed, so this operation may remove it (often by replacing it with a new
   * AtomicInteger).

repeat the steps to configure a remote target ARN and add replication rules to the source bucket's replication config.

Note that on the source side, the `X-Amz-Replication-Status` changes from `PENDING` to `COMPLETED` after replication succeeds to each of the targets. On the destination side, a `X-Amz-Replication-Status` status of `REPLICA` indicates that the object was replicated successfully. Any replication failures are automatically re-attempted during a periodic disk scanner cycle....

            // or completion values.
            newFuture.setFuture(oldFuture);
          } else if (outputFuture.isCancelled() && taskExecutor.trySetCancelled()) {
            // If this CAS succeeds, we know that the provided callable will never be invoked,
            // so when oldFuture completes it is safe to allow the next submitted task to