Appendable secretlyAWriter = new StringWriter();
    result = CharStreams.asWriter(secretlyAWriter);
    assertSame(secretlyAWriter, result);
  }

  // CharStreams.copy has type specific optimizations for Readers,StringBuilders and Writers

  public void testCopy() throws IOException {
    StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder();
    long copied =
        CharStreams.copy(

    Appendable secretlyAWriter = new StringWriter();
    result = CharStreams.asWriter(secretlyAWriter);
    assertSame(secretlyAWriter, result);
  }

  // CharStreams.copy has type specific optimizations for Readers,StringBuilders and Writers

  public void testCopy() throws IOException {
    StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder();
    long copied =
        CharStreams.copy(

import java.nio.CharBuffer;
import java.util.Random;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Benchmarks for {@link CharStreams#copy}.
 *
 * <p>{@link CharStreams#copy} has type specific optimizations for various common Appendable and
 * Reader implementations, this compares the performance of the different options.
 */
// These benchmarks allocate a lot of data so use a large heap
@VmOptions({"-Xms12g", "-Xmx12g", "-d64"})

- **Template Method** - Resource traversal utilities with customizable handlers
- **Utility Classes** - All core functionality exposed through static utility methods for easy access

### Performance Optimizations
- **Caching** - Bean descriptors and reflection metadata are cached for improved performance
- **Lazy initialization** - Resources and expensive operations are initialized only when needed  

    checkElementIndex(index, size);
    // requireNonNull is safe because we guarantee that the first `size` elements are non-null.
    return (E) requireNonNull(array[index]);
  }

  // TODO(lowasser): benchmark optimizations for equals() and see if they're worthwhile

  // redeclare to help optimizers with b/310253115
  @SuppressWarnings("RedundantOverride")
  @Override
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible
    Object writeReplace() {

- Optimization of kubectl Chinese translation ([#110538](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/110538), [@hwdef](https://github.com/hwdef)) [SIG CLI]

### Failing Test

- cloud.google.com/go/networkconnectivity: v1.11.0
- cloud.google.com/go/networkmanagement: v1.6.0
- cloud.google.com/go/networksecurity: v0.8.0
- cloud.google.com/go/notebooks: v1.8.0
- cloud.google.com/go/optimization: v1.3.1
- cloud.google.com/go/orchestration: v1.6.0
- cloud.google.com/go/orgpolicy: v1.10.0
- cloud.google.com/go/osconfig: v1.11.0
- cloud.google.com/go/oslogin: v1.9.0

   * even to an intermediate buffer) should be considerably more efficient than potentially
   * copying the CharSequence to a String and then calling getBytes(Charset) on that String, in
   * reality there are optimizations that make the getBytes(Charset) approach considerably faster,
   * at least for commonly used charsets like UTF-8.
   */

  @Override
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  public final Hasher putByte(byte b) {

        assertTrue("Boundary value tests should be fast", true);
    }

    public void test_performance_optimization() {
        // Verify that performance optimizations are working
        long startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
        try {
            dataIndexHelper.crawl("performance-test");
        } catch (Exception e) {
            // Expected
        }

SIG Scheduling development efforts have been primarily focused on improving performance and reliability of the scheduler.
- Performance of the inter-pod affinity/anti-affinity feature is improved over 100X via algorithmic optimization.
- DaemonSet pods, which used to be scheduled by the DaemonSet controller, will be scheduled by the default scheduler in 1.12. This change allows DaemonSet pods to enjoy all the scheduling features of the default scheduler.