* it is returned directly. Otherwise, a new array of size {@code minLength + padding} is
   * returned, containing the values of {@code array}, and zeroes in the remaining places.
   *
   * @param array the source array
   * @param minLength the minimum length the returned array must guarantee
   * @param padding an extra amount to "grow" the array by if growth is necessary

   * it is returned directly. Otherwise, a new array of size {@code minLength + padding} is
   * returned, containing the values of {@code array}, and zeroes in the remaining places.
   *
   * @param array the source array
   * @param minLength the minimum length the returned array must guarantee
   * @param padding an extra amount to "grow" the array by if growth is necessary

  }

  private <T> TypeToken<Iterable<T>> anyIterableType() {
    return new TypeToken<Iterable<T>>() {};
  }

  @SuppressWarnings("rawtypes") // TODO(cpovirk): Can we at least use Class<?> in some places?
  abstract static class TestTypeToInstanceMapGenerator
      implements TestMapGenerator<TypeToken, Object> {

    @Override
    public TypeToken<?>[] createKeyArray(int length) {

    opcode = b0 and B0_MASK_OPCODE
    isFinalFrame = b0 and B0_FLAG_FIN != 0
    isControlFrame = b0 and OPCODE_FLAG_CONTROL != 0

    // Control frames must be final frames (cannot contain continuations).
    if (isControlFrame && !isFinalFrame) {
      throw ProtocolException("Control frames must be final.")
    }

    val reservedFlag1 = b0 and B0_FLAG_RSV1 != 0
    when (opcode) {
      OPCODE_TEXT, OPCODE_BINARY -> {

   * it is returned directly. Otherwise, a new array of size {@code minLength + padding} is
   * returned, containing the values of {@code array}, and zeroes in the remaining places.
   *
   * @param array the source array
   * @param minLength the minimum length the returned array must guarantee
   * @param padding an extra amount to "grow" the array by if growth is necessary

        assertEquals(-1, negativeAvFlags.getFlags(), "Flags should be -1 for all FF bytes");
    }

    /**
     * Test constructor with integer flags.
     */
    @Test
    void testAvFlagsIntConstructor() {
        // Test with a positive integer
        int flags = 0x12345678;
        AvFlags avFlags = new AvFlags(flags);
        assertNotNull(avFlags, "AvFlags object should not be null");

     *
     * @param config the configuration
     * @param compressionAlgorithms the supported compression algorithms
     * @param flags compression flags (reserved, should be 0)
     */
    public CompressionNegotiateContext(final Configuration config, final int[] compressionAlgorithms, final int flags) {

/kind bug
/kind cleanup
/kind documentation
/kind feature

Optionally add one or more of the following kinds if applicable:
/kind api-change
/kind deprecation
/kind failing-test
/kind flake
/kind regression
-->

#### What this PR does / why we need it:

#### Which issue(s) this PR is related to:
<!--
Please link relevant issues to help with tracking.

    void testConstructor_CreateAndOpen() {
        int flags = SmbFile.O_CREAT;
        smbComOpenAndX = new SmbComOpenAndX(fileName, access, flags, andx);
        assertEquals(0x11, smbComOpenAndX.openFunction); // OPEN_FN_CREATE | OPEN_FN_OPEN
    }

    /**
     * Test constructor with no special flags.
     */
    @Test
    void testConstructor_OpenOnly() {
        int flags = 0;

        @Test
        @DisplayName("isFlagSet should correctly identify set flags")
        void testIsFlagSet() {
            // Test when flag is not set
            message.flags = 0;
            assertFalse(message.isFlagSet(DcerpcConstants.RPC_C_PF_BROADCAST));

            // Test when flag is set
            message.flags = DcerpcConstants.RPC_C_PF_BROADCAST;