* Java compilation of Gradle code suffers from small performance penalty (up to 10%).
* Time has to be allocated to clean up existing projects.
* One has to write NullAway-conformant code even when hacking.
* Some patterns used to satisfy NullAway can be slightly more verbose.

    /**
     * Describes the target processes that the code in this module must be able
     * to run on, by definition. All modules that this module depends on will
     * then be required to also support these target runtimes.
     *
     * The required runtimes for a project should be set if that project has
     * specific runtime requirements. For example, they must be able to run in

    }

    @Test
    public void test_escapeLDAPSearchFilter_withNormalInput() {
        LdapManager ldapManager = new LdapManager();
        ldapManager.init();

        // Normal input should not be escaped
        assertEquals("normaluser", ldapManager.escapeLDAPSearchFilter("normaluser"));
        assertEquals("user123", ldapManager.escapeLDAPSearchFilter("user123"));

                .when()
                .put(getApiPath() + "/upload/");

        // Storage may not be enabled, so accept various responses
        int statusCode = response.getStatusCode();
        assertTrue(statusCode == 200 || statusCode == 400 || statusCode == 500,
                "Status code should be 200, 400 or 500, but was " + statusCode);
    }

    @Test
    void testDownload_notFound() {

    }

    @Test
    public void test_destroy() {
        // Initialize without container
        emptyGenerator = new EmptyGenerator();

        // Test that destroy method can be called without error
        emptyGenerator.destroy();
        // Call destroy multiple times to ensure it's safe
        emptyGenerator.destroy();
        emptyGenerator.destroy();
    }

    @Test

    /**
     * Constructs a new RequestParameter with the specified name and values.
     *
     * @param name the name of the parameter, must not be null
     * @param values the array of values for this parameter, can be null or empty
     */
    public RequestParameter(final String name, final String[] values) {
        this.name = name;
        this.values = values;
    }

    /**

        CommandExecutionException exception1 = new CommandExecutionException("Test");
        CommandExecutionException exception2 = new CommandExecutionException("Test");

        // Both instances should be of the same class
        assertEquals(exception1.getClass(), exception2.getClass());

        // Test serialization compatibility by checking class name

    /**
     * The parameter name for the access token.
     * This field specifies how the token should be passed in API requests.
     * Maximum length is 10000 characters.
     */
    @Size(max = 10000)
    public String parameterName;

    /**
     * The expiration date and time for the access token.
     * Must be in ISO 8601 format: YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SS
     */

            assertEquals("Invalid hour value: 24 in time: 24:00. Hour must be between 0 and 23", e.getMessage());
        }

        try {
            IntervalControlHelper.parseTime("12:60");
            fail("Should throw FessSystemException");
        } catch (FessSystemException e) {
            assertEquals("Invalid minute value: 60 in time: 12:60. Minute must be between 0 and 59", e.getMessage());
        }

        try {

* To avoid asking the same thing multiple times during code review.
* To explain *rejected solutions*, for now, and future development, in case they are proposed again.

ADRs can be written by any team.
Like code, they should be reviewed by any other relevant teams.
The goal is not to *own* a decision, but to *share* it with other teams, and improve the build tool together.

### Format