<type>String</type>
          <defaultValue><![CDATA[]]></defaultValue>
          <description><![CDATA[If specified, identifies this phase as a dynamic phase to decorate the specified phase id, e.g. {@code after} or {@code before}.]]></description>
        </field>
        <field xml.attribute="true">
          <name>priority</name>
          <required>false</required>
          <version>2.0.0+</version>
          <type>int</type>

{* ../../docs_src/async_tests/test_main.py hl[7] *}

/// tip

Note that the test function is now `async def` instead of just `def` as before when using the `TestClient`.

///

Then we can create an `AsyncClient` with the app, and send async requests to it, using `await`.

{* ../../docs_src/async_tests/test_main.py hl[9:12] *}

  // If all API server instances agree on the same encoding storage version,
  // then this field is set to that version. Otherwise this field is left empty.
  // API servers should finish updating its storageVersionStatus entry before
  // serving write operations, so that this field will be in sync with the reality.
  // +optional
  optional string commonEncodingVersion = 2;

  // The latest available observations of the storageVersion's state.

fix. Even if you think it's relatively minor, it's helpful to know what people
are working on. And as mentioned above, API changes should be discussed
thoroughly before moving to code.

Some examples of types of pull requests that are immediately helpful:

  - Fixing a bug without changing a public API.
  - Fixing or improving documentation.
  - Improvements to Maven configuration.

  private val listener = EventSourceRecorder()
  private var client =
    clientTestRule.newClientBuilder()
      .eventListenerFactory(clientTestRule.wrap(eventListener))
      .build()

  @BeforeEach
  fun before(server: MockWebServer) {
    this.server = server
  }

  @AfterEach
  fun after() {
    listener.assertExhausted()
  }

  @Test
  fun event() {
    server.enqueue(
      MockResponse.Builder()

 *   <li>NullAway, which will <a
 *       href="https://github.com/google/guava/issues/6126#issuecomment-1204399671">treat it
 *       identically to {@code Nullable} as of version 0.9.9</a>. To treat it that way before then,
 *       you can set {@code
 *       -XepOpt:NullAway:CustomNullableAnnotations=com.google.common.base.ParametricNullness,...,com.google.common.util.concurrent.ParametricNullness},

   * the entry was returned by the iterator, except through the setValue operation on the map entry"
   * As such, this field must be cleared before every map mutation.
   *
   * Note about volatile: volatile doesn't make it safe to read from a mutable graph in one thread
   * while writing to it in another. All it does is help with _reading_ from multiple threads

 *   <li>NullAway, which will <a
 *       href="https://github.com/google/guava/issues/6126#issuecomment-1204399671">treat it
 *       identically to {@code Nullable} as of version 0.9.9</a>. To treat it that way before then,
 *       you can set {@code
 *       -XepOpt:NullAway:CustomNullableAnnotations=com.google.common.base.ParametricNullness,...,com.google.common.util.concurrent.ParametricNullness},

 *   <li>NullAway, which will <a
 *       href="https://github.com/google/guava/issues/6126#issuecomment-1204399671">treat it
 *       identically to {@code Nullable} as of version 0.9.9</a>. To treat it that way before then,
 *       you can set {@code
 *       -XepOpt:NullAway:CustomNullableAnnotations=com.google.common.base.ParametricNullness,...,com.google.common.util.concurrent.ParametricNullness},

 *   <li>NullAway, which will <a
 *       href="https://github.com/google/guava/issues/6126#issuecomment-1204399671">treat it
 *       identically to {@code Nullable} as of version 0.9.9</a>. To treat it that way before then,
 *       you can set {@code
 *       -XepOpt:NullAway:CustomNullableAnnotations=com.google.common.base.ParametricNullness,...,com.google.common.util.concurrent.ParametricNullness},