Ainsi, `0.5` serait une valeur valide. Mais `0.0` ou `0` ne le serait pas.

Et la même chose pour <abbr title="less than"><code>lt</code></abbr>.

{* ../../docs_src/path_params_numeric_validations/tutorial006_an_py39.py hl[13] *}

## Pour résumer

  }

  /**
   * This is adapted from the regex suggested by {@link Double#valueOf(String)} for prevalidating
   * inputs. All valid inputs must pass this regex, but it's semantically fine if not all inputs
   * that pass this regex are valid -- only a performance hit is incurred, not a semantics bug.
   */
  @GwtIncompatible // regular expressions
  static final
  java.util.regex.Pattern

            assertEquals(TEST_TARGET, message.getTarget());
            assertNotNull(message.getTargetInformation());
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Constructor with byte array should parse valid message")
        void testConstructor_ByteArray_ValidMessage() throws IOException {
            // Given
            CIFSContext mockContext = createMockContext();

        return crawlingConfig.getConfigParameterMap(config);
    }

    /**
     * Validates if the given URL string is a valid URL.
     *
     * @param urlStr the URL string to validate
     * @return true if the URL is valid, false otherwise
     */
    protected boolean isValidUrl(final String urlStr) {
        if (StringUtil.isBlank(urlStr)) {
            return false;
        }

			// files generated by a pre-Go1.8 toolchain. If the generated file
			// happened to have a prefix field that parses as valid
			// atime and ctime fields (e.g., when they are valid octal strings),
			// then it is impossible to distinguish between a valid GNU file
			// and an invalid pre-Go1.8 file.
			//
			// See https://golang.org/issues/12594
			// See https://golang.org/issues/21005

background-color: rgba(40, 167, 69, 0.9);\n  border-radius: 0.25rem;\n}\n\n.form-row > .col > .valid-tooltip,\n.form-row > [class*=\"col-\"] > .valid-tooltip {\n  left: 5px;\n}\n\n.was-validated :valid ~ .valid-feedback,\n.was-validated :valid ~ .valid-tooltip,\n.is-valid ~ .valid-feedback,\n.is-valid ~ .valid-tooltip {\n  display: block;\n}\n\n.was-validated .form-control:valid, .form-control.is-valid {\n  border-color: #28a745;\n  padding-right: calc(1.5em + 0.75rem) !important;\n  background-image:...

          shift += 24;
          len += 3;
        } else {
          int codePoint = Character.codePointAt(input, i);
          if (codePoint == c) {
            // not a valid code point; let the JDK handle invalid Unicode
            return hashBytes(input.toString().getBytes(charset));
          }
          i++;
          buffer |= codePointToFourUtf8Bytes(codePoint) << shift;

            assertEquals(0, result);
        }
    }

    @Nested
    @DisplayName("ReadBytesWireFormat Tests")
    class ReadBytesWireFormatTests {

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should read valid write response")
        void testReadValidWriteResponse() throws SMBProtocolDecodingException {
            byte[] buffer = createValidWriteResponse(1024, 512);

```JSON
{
  "detail": [
    {
      "type": "int_parsing",
      "loc": [
        "path",
        "item_id"
      ],
      "msg": "Input should be a valid integer, unable to parse string as an integer",
      "input": "foo"
    }
  ]
}
```

Der Pfad-Parameter `item_id` hatte den Wert `"foo"`, was kein `int` ist.

        </field>
        <field>
          <name>checksumPolicy</name>
          <version>1.0.0</version>
          <description>
            What to do when verification of an artifact checksum fails. Valid values are "fail" (default for Maven 4 and
            above), "warn" (default for Maven 3) or "ignore".
          </description>
          <type>String</type>
        </field>
      </fields>
    </class>