public void run() {
      try {
        future.get();
      } catch (Exception e) {
        // nothing
      }
    }

    @SuppressWarnings("ThreadPriorityCheck") // TODO: b/175898629 - Consider onSpinWait.
    void awaitWaiting() {
      while (!isBlocked()) {
        if (getState() == State.TERMINATED) {
          throw new RuntimeException("Thread exited");
        }
        Thread.yield();

   *     such index exists.
   */
  public static int indexOf(float[] array, float target) {
    return indexOf(array, target, 0, array.length);
  }

  // TODO(kevinb): consider making this public
  private static int indexOf(float[] array, float target, int start, int end) {
    for (int i = start; i < end; i++) {
      if (array[i] == target) {
        return i;
      }
    }

   *     such index exists.
   */
  public static int indexOf(double[] array, double target) {
    return indexOf(array, target, 0, array.length);
  }

  // TODO(kevinb): consider making this public
  private static int indexOf(double[] array, double target, int start, int end) {
    for (int i = start; i < end; i++) {
      if (array[i] == target) {
        return i;
      }
    }

   *     such index exists.
   */
  public static int indexOf(float[] array, float target) {
    return indexOf(array, target, 0, array.length);
  }

  // TODO(kevinb): consider making this public
  private static int indexOf(float[] array, float target, int start, int end) {
    for (int i = start; i < end; i++) {
      if (array[i] == target) {
        return i;
      }
    }

   * bufferSize ≥ k, then we can ignore any elements greater than this value.
   */
  @CheckForNull private T threshold;

  @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // TODO(cpovirk): Consider storing Object[] instead of T[].
  private TopKSelector(Comparator<? super T> comparator, int k) {
    this.comparator = checkNotNull(comparator, "comparator");
    this.k = k;

 * automatic-closing approach described above is safer.
 *
 * @param <V> the type of the value of this step
 * @since 30.0
 */
// TODO(dpb): Consider reusing one CloseableList for the entire pipeline, modulo combinations.
@DoNotMock("Use ClosingFuture.from(Futures.immediate*Future)")
@J2ktIncompatible
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
// TODO(dpb): GWT compatibility.

 *       Future} returned by this class, the next task may still have to wait.</i>.
 *   <li>Once an {@code AsyncCallable} returns a {@code Future}, this class considers that task to
 *       be "done" as soon as <i>that</i> {@code Future} completes in any way. Notably, a {@code
 *       Future} is "completed" even if it is cancelled while its underlying work continues on a

  // +listType=set
  // Required.
  repeated string nonResourceURLs = 6;
}

// PolicyRulesWithSubjects prescribes a test that applies to a request to an apiserver. The test considers the subject
// making the request, the verb being requested, and the resource to be acted upon. This PolicyRulesWithSubjects matches

/// tip

If you are already using **FastAPI** version **0.99.0 or above**, you can probably **skip** these details.

They are more relevant for older versions, before OpenAPI 3.1.0 was available.

You can consider this a brief OpenAPI and JSON Schema **history lesson**. 🤓

///

/// warning

These are very technical details about the standards **JSON Schema** and **OpenAPI**.

     * contrast to the "V?" type that we're using. As a result, Kotlin sees a conflict between the
     * nullness annotations in ImmutableMap and those in its own Map type. In response, it considers
     * the parameter and return type both to be platform types. As a result, Kotlin permits calls
     * that can lead to NullPointerException. That's unfortunate. But hopefully most Kotlin callers