$MC_COMMAND
	STATUS=$?
	until [ $STATUS = 0 ]; do
		ATTEMPTS=$(expr $ATTEMPTS + 1)
		echo \"Failed attempts: $ATTEMPTS\"
		if [ $ATTEMPTS -gt $LIMIT ]; then
			exit 1
		fi
		sleep 2 # 1 second intervals between attempts
		$MC_COMMAND
		STATUS=$?
	done
	set -e # reset `e` as active
	return 0
}

# checkBucketExists ($bucket)
# Check if the bucket exists, by using the exit code of `mc ls`

        assertTrue(pairs.get(0) instanceof AvFlags, "First pair should be AvFlags instance");

        // Check second pair (AvTimestamp)
        assertEquals(AvPair.MsvAvTimestamp, pairs.get(1).getType(), "Second pair should be MsvAvTimestamp");
        assertTrue(pairs.get(1) instanceof AvTimestamp, "Second pair should be AvTimestamp instance");

        // Check third pair (AvTargetName)

   * - The first request "wins the race".
   * - The second request discovers it "lost the race" and closes the connection it just opened.
   * - The second request uses the coalesced connection from request1.
   * - The coalesced connection is violently closed after servicing the first request.
   * - The second request discovers the coalesced connection is unhealthy just after acquiring it.
   */
  @Test

			}
			sizeS.totalSize = s.Size()
			sizeS.versions++
			return sizeS, nil
		}
		return sizeS, err
	}
	xls := xlStorage{drivePath: base, diskInfoCache: cachevalue.New[DiskInfo]()}
	xls.diskInfoCache.InitOnce(time.Second, cachevalue.Opts{}, func(ctx context.Context) (DiskInfo, error) {
		return DiskInfo{Total: 1 << 40, Free: 1 << 40}, nil
	})
	weSleep := func() bool { return false }

    * Si on compare Uvicorn, il faut le comparer à d'autre applications de serveurs comme Daphne, Hypercorn, uWSGI, etc.
* **Starlette** :
    * A les seconde meilleures performances après Uvicorn. Starlette utilise en réalité Uvicorn. De ce fait, il ne peut qu’être plus "lent" qu'Uvicorn car il requiert l'exécution de plus de code.

package store

import (
	"context"
	"errors"
	"sync"
	"time"
)

// ErrBatchFull indicates that the batch is full
var ErrBatchFull = errors.New("batch is full")

const defaultCommitTimeout = 30 * time.Second

// Batch represents an ordered batch
type Batch[I any] struct {
	items  []I
	limit  uint32
	store  Store[I]
	quitCh chan struct{}

	sync.Mutex
}

// BatchConfig represents the batch config

        byte[] buffer1 = testCache.getBuffer();
        byte[] buffer2 = testCache.getBuffer();

        // Then
        assertNotNull(buffer1, "First buffer should not be null");
        assertNotNull(buffer2, "Second buffer should not be null");
        assertEquals(1024, buffer1.length, "Buffer should have expected size");
        assertEquals(1024, buffer2.length, "Buffer should have expected size");

 * #iterator()} method after the first, and whose iterator is always unmodifiable.
 *
 * <p>The {@code Iterable} specification does not make it absolutely clear what should happen on a
 * second invocation, so implementors have made various choices, including:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>returning the same iterator again
 *   <li>throwing an exception of some kind

	configLock.RLock()
	r.Header.Set(xhttp.SubnetAPIKey, c.APIKey)
	configLock.RUnlock()
	r.Header.Set(xhttp.MinioDeploymentID, xhttp.GlobalDeploymentID)

	client := &http.Client{
		Timeout:   10 * time.Second,
		Transport: c.transport,
	}

	resp, err := client.Do(r)
	if err != nil {
		return "", err
	}
	defer xhttp.DrainBody(resp.Body)

	respBytes, err := io.ReadAll(io.LimitReader(resp.Body, respBodyLimit))

    enableProtocol(protocol)

    server.enqueue(
      MockResponse
        .Builder()
        .trailers(headersOf("t1", "v2"))
        .bodyDelay(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS)
        .body(protocol, "Hello")
        .build(),
    )

    val call = client.newCall(Request(server.url("/")))
    call.execute().use { response ->
      response.close()