assertEquals(distinct, getMultiset().elementSet().size());
  }

  @CollectionFeature.Require(absent = SUPPORTS_REMOVE)
  public void testRemove_occurrences_unsupported_absent() {
    // notice: we don't care whether it succeeds, or fails with UOE
    try {
      assertEquals(
          "multiset.remove(absent, 2) didn't return 0 or throw an exception",
          0,
          getMultiset().remove(e3(), 2));

    }

    /**
     * Checks if the AV pairs list contains a pair of the specified type
     *
     * @param pairs the list of AV pairs to search
     * @param type the AV pair type to look for
     * @return whether the list contains a pair of that type
     */
    public static boolean contains(final List<AvPair> pairs, final int type) {
        if (pairs == null) {
            return false;
        }

import java.lang.annotation.Target;

import org.apache.maven.api.annotations.Experimental;

/**
 * Indicates that a given field will be injected with the result of
 * a dependency collection or resolution request. Whether a collection
 * or resolution request is performed is controlled by the {@link #pathScope()}
 * field, the injected field type and the {@link #requestType()}.
 * <p>

    @ValidateTypeFailure
    public Integer intervalTime;

    /** The boost value for search ranking (required). */
    @Required
    @ValidateTypeFailure
    public Float boost;

    /** Whether this configuration is available for crawling (required, maximum 5 characters). */
    @Required
    @Size(max = 5)
    public String available;

   * with {@code FeatureSpecificTestSuiteBuilder.suppressing()} until <a
   * href="https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-6409434">JDK-6409434</a> is fixed. It's unclear
   * whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix will be to
   * permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on the other.

   * with {@code FeatureSpecificTestSuiteBuilder.suppressing()} until <a
   * href="https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-6409434">JDK-6409434</a> is fixed. It's unclear
   * whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix will be to
   * permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on the other.

     * @return array of supported algorithm constants
     */
    int[] getSupportedAlgorithms();

    /**
     * Estimates the compression ratio for the given data and algorithm.
     * This can be used to decide whether compression is worthwhile.
     *
     * @param data the data to analyze
     * @param algorithm the compression algorithm
     * @return estimated compression ratio (0.0 to 1.0, where 0.5 means 50% size reduction)

     */
    private volatile long lastAccessTime;

    /**
     * The associated lease key if this handle has an SMB2 lease
     */
    private final Smb2LeaseKey leaseKey;

    /**
     * Flag indicating whether this handle is currently being reconnected
     */
    private volatile boolean reconnecting;

    // Not serialized - will be null after deserialization

		if _, ok := list.targets[target.ID()]; ok {
			return fmt.Errorf("target %v already exists", target.ID())
		}
		list.targets[target.ID()] = target
	}

	return nil
}

// Lookup - checks whether target by target ID exists is valid or not.
func (list *TargetList) Lookup(arnStr string) (Target, error) {
	list.RLock()
	defer list.RUnlock()

	arn, err := ParseARN(arnStr)
	if err != nil {
		return nil, err
	}

   * removeFrom.removeIf(predicate)} instead.
   *
   * @param removeFrom the iterable to (potentially) remove elements from
   * @param predicate a predicate that determines whether an element should be removed
   * @return {@code true} if any elements were removed from the iterable
   * @throws UnsupportedOperationException if the iterable does not support {@code remove()}.
   * @since 2.0
   */