public class DeferredTest {
    @Test
    public void test_doneBeforeResolve() throws Exception {
        final Deferred<SuggestResponse> deferred = new Deferred<>();

        Thread th = new Thread(() -> {
            try {
                Thread.sleep(1000);
            } catch (InterruptedException ignore) {}
            deferred.resolve(new SuggestResponse("", 0, Collections.emptyList(), 0, null));
        });
        th.start();

          @Override
          void afterRanInterruptiblyFailure(Throwable error) {}
        };
    Thread runner = new Thread(task, "runner");
    runner.start();
    isInterruptibleRegistered.await();
    // trigger the interrupt on another thread since it will block
    Thread interrupter =
        new Thread("Interrupter") {
          @Override
          public void run() {
            task.interruptTask();

    start();
  }

  // Thread.stop() is okay because all threads started by a test are dying at the end of the test,
  // so there is no object state put at risk by stopping the threads abruptly. In some cases a test
  // may put a thread into an uninterruptible operation intentionally, so there is no other way to
  // clean up these threads.
  @SuppressWarnings("deprecation")
  @Override

				// will force the runtime to scrap the current thread, that is maybe
				// not as optimal but at least always safe to do.
				runtime.UnlockOSThread()
			}
		}()

		return toRun()
	}

	var wg sync.WaitGroup
	wg.Add(1)

	// Start the callback in a new green thread so that if we later fail
	// to switch the namespace back to the original one, we can safely

    }
  }

  /** Wait for the given thread to reach the {@link State#TIMED_WAITING} thread state. */
  @SuppressWarnings("ThreadPriorityCheck") // TODO: b/175898629 - Consider onSpinWait.
  void awaitTimedWaiting(Thread thread) {
    while (true) {
      switch (thread.getState()) {
        case BLOCKED:
        case NEW:
        case RUNNABLE:
        case WAITING:
          Thread.yield();
          break;

          @Override
          public void run() {
            list.execute();
          }
        };
    Thread thread1 = new Thread(execute);
    Thread thread2 = new Thread(execute);
    thread1.start();
    thread2.start();
    assertEquals(0, runCalled.get());
    okayToRun.countDown();
    thread1.join();
    thread2.join();
    assertEquals(1, runCalled.get());
  }

  public void testAddAfterRun() throws Exception {

   *       directExecutor}, the listener can execute in any of three possible threads:
   *       <ol>
   *         <li>When a thread attaches a listener to a {@code ListenableFuture} that's already
   *             complete, the listener runs immediately in that thread.
   *         <li>When a thread attaches a listener to a {@code ListenableFuture} that's

        logger.log(
            Level.INFO, "Failed to create a thread without inherited thread-local values", t);
      }
    }
    if (thread == null) {
      thread = new Thread((ThreadGroup) null, finalizer, threadName);
    }
    thread.setDaemon(true);

    try {
      if (inheritableThreadLocals != null) {
        inheritableThreadLocals.set(thread, null);
      }
    } catch (Throwable t) {
      logger.log(

    start();
  }

  // Thread.stop() is okay because all threads started by a test are dying at the end of the test,
  // so there is no object state put at risk by stopping the threads abruptly. In some cases a test
  // may put a thread into an uninterruptible operation intentionally, so there is no other way to
  // clean up these threads.
  @SuppressWarnings("deprecation")
  @Override

        return instance;
    }

    /**
     * 処理を開始します。
     */
    public synchronized void start() {
        if (thread == null) {
            thread = new Thread(this, "CoreLib-TimeoutManager");
            thread.setDaemon(true);
            thread.start();
            if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
                logger.debug("TimeoutManager started.");
            }
        }
    }