The most common is the implicit flow.

The most secure is the code flow, but it's more complex to implement as it requires more steps. As it is more complex, many providers end up suggesting the implicit flow.

/// note

It's common that each authentication provider names their flows in a different way, to make it part of their brand.

        writer.write("\n")
        extensions.forEach {
            writer.write("\n${it.toKotlinString()}")
        }
    }


/**
 * An implicit file class like `AbcKt` that Kotlin generates is also part of the public API,
 * and it should be appropriately marked with `@file:Incubating`.
 *

 * the order in which elements in the POM are overridden

 * minimum element-set for a valid project pom


Maven super model

 Inheritance is recursive in Maven but there is a special model which is the implicit super parent in the lineage
 of models you may specify:

 all of the models that you specify are collected to produce a lineage and then the super model is place at
 the top of that lineage to provide default values.

    * Некоторые из этих "потоков" подходят для реализации аутентификации через сторонний сервис использующий OAuth 2.0 (например, Google, Facebook, X (Twitter), GitHub и т.д.):
        * `implicit`
        * `clientCredentials`
        * `authorizationCode`
    * Но есть один конкретный "поток", который может быть идеально использован для обработки аутентификации непосредственно в том же приложении:

  * Varios de estos flujos son apropiados para construir un proveedor de autenticación OAuth 2.0 (como Google, Facebook, X (Twitter), GitHub, etc.):
    * `implicit`
    * `clientCredentials`
    * `authorizationCode`
  * Pero hay un "flujo" específico que puede usarse perfectamente para manejar la autenticación directamente en la misma aplicación:

    #   o isEnvOnlyFloatLeft: is it environment only? (and show as float-left?) (NotRequired)
    #   o extendsPropRequest: other request name of exnteds-properties (NotRequired)
    #   o isCheckImplicitOverride: does it check implicit override? (NotRequired)
    #
    #; propertiesHtmlMap = map:{
    #    ; MaihamaEnv = map:{
    #        ; baseDir = ../src
    #        ; rootFile = $$baseDir$$/main/resources/maihama_env.properties

Am häufigsten ist der „Implicit“-Flow.

Am sichersten ist der „Code“-Flow, die Implementierung ist jedoch komplexer, da mehr Schritte erforderlich sind. Da er komplexer ist, schlagen viele Anbieter letztendlich den „Implicit“-Flow vor.

/// note | Hinweis

        }, "Should throw StackOverflowError due to recursive call");
    }

    // --- readUnparsedTagged ---

    @Test
    void testReadUnparsedTagged_Success() throws IOException {
        // Tag [1] IMPLICIT, content is 0x01 0x02 0x03
        byte[] data = new byte[] { (byte) 0xA1, 0x03, 0x01, 0x02, 0x03 };
        ByteArrayInputStream bais = new ByteArrayInputStream(data);
        ASN1InputStream ais = new ASN1InputStream(bais);

				key, subSys)
		}
		h = config.HelpKVS{value}
	}

	help := config.HelpKVS{}

	// Only for multiple targets, make sure
	// to list the ENV, for regular k/v EnableKey is
	// implicit, for ENVs we cannot make it implicit.
	if subSysHelp.MultipleTargets {
		key := madmin.EnableKey
		if envOnly {
			key = config.EnvPrefix + strings.ToTitle(subSys) + config.EnvWordDelimiter + strings.ToTitle(madmin.EnableKey)
		}

            InputLocation location = plugin.getLocation("");
            if (location != null && location.getSource() != null) {
                trackingData.add(indent + location.getSource().getModelId() + " (implicit)");
                indent.append("  ");
            }
        } else if (collectStepTrace != null) {
            if (collectStepTrace.getPath().get(0).getArtifact() == null) {
                return;
            }