// useful testable guarantees about the behavior of that dispatcher in a multithreaded
    // environment. Here we simply test that all the expected dispatches happened in some order.
    assertThat(dispatchedSubscribers).containsExactly(i1, i2, i3, s1, s1, s1, s1, s2, s2, s2, s2);
  }

  public void testImmediateDispatcher() {
    dispatcher = Dispatcher.immediate();

		Active:   true,
	}}

	if err := DB.Create(&users).Error; err != nil {
		t.Errorf("errors happened when create: %v", err)
	}

	var name string
	var total int
	if err := DB.Model(&User{}).Select("name, sum(age)").Where("name = ?", "groupby").Group("name").Row().Scan(&name, &total); err != nil {
		t.Errorf("no error should happen, but got %v", err)
	}

	if name != "groupby" || total != 60 {

  - type: input
    id: Gpu
    attributes:
      label: GPU model and memory
      description: If compiling from source
  - type: textarea
    id: what-happened
    attributes:
      label: Current behavior?
      description: Also tell us, what did you expect to happen?
      placeholder: Tell us what you see!
    validations:
      required: true
  - type: textarea
    id: code-to-reproduce
    attributes:

		*GetUser("distinct", Config{}),
		*GetUser("distinct-2", Config{}),
		*GetUser("distinct-3", Config{}),
	}
	users[0].Age = 20

	if err := DB.Create(&users).Error; err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("errors happened when create users: %v", err)
	}

	var names []string
	DB.Table("users").Where("name like ?", "distinct%").Order("name").Pluck("name", &names)

    // useful testable guarantees about the behavior of that dispatcher in a multithreaded
    // environment. Here we simply test that all the expected dispatches happened in some order.
    assertThat(dispatchedSubscribers).containsExactly(i1, i2, i3, s1, s1, s1, s1, s2, s2, s2, s2);
  }

  public void testImmediateDispatcher() {
    dispatcher = Dispatcher.immediate();

	}

	if err := DB.Create(&data).Error; err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("No error should happened when create scanner valuer struct, but got %v", err)
	}

	var result ScannerValuerStruct

	if err := DB.Find(&result, "id = ?", data.ID).Error; err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("no error should happen when query scanner, valuer struct, but got %v", err)
	}

	if result.ExampleStructPtr.Val != "value2" {

    // drop the contract on the method that enforces this queue like behavior since depending on it
    // is likely to be a bug anyway.

    // N.B. All writes to the list and the next pointers must have happened before the above
    // synchronized block, so we can iterate the list without the lock held here.
    RunnableExecutorPair reversedList = null;
    while (list != null) {
      RunnableExecutorPair tmp = list;

	}

	var count3 int64
	if err := DB.Model(&User{}).Where("name in ?", []string{user2.Name, user2.Name, user3.Name}).Group("id").Count(&count3).Error; err != nil {
		t.Errorf("Error happened when count with group, but got %v", err)
	}

	if count3 != 2 {
		t.Errorf("Should get correct count for count with group, but got %v", count3)
	}

	dryDB := DB.Session(&gorm.Session{DryRun: true})

      if (e.getCause() instanceof IllegalArgumentException) {
        /*
         * IllegalArgumentException is the one unchecked exception that we know is likely to happen
         * (thanks to the checkArgument calls in getAnnotatedMethodsNotCached). If it happens, we'd
         * prefer to propagate an IllegalArgumentException to the caller. However, we don't want to

	}

	if err := DB.Table("column_structs").Migrator().AlterColumn(&ColumnStruct{}, "Name"); err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("no error should happened when alter column, but got %v", err)
	}

	if err := DB.Table("column_structs").AutoMigrate(&ColumnStruct2{}); err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("no error should happened when auto migrate column, but got %v", err)
	}

	if columnTypes, err := DB.Migrator().ColumnTypes(&ColumnStruct{}); err != nil {