│ ID  │ Pools                           │ Capacity                         │ Status │
│ 1st │ http://minio{1...2}/data{1...4} │ 439 GiB (used) / 561 GiB (total) │ Active │
│ 2nd │ http://minio{3...4}/data{1...4} │ 329 GiB (used) / 421 GiB (total) │ Active │
└─────┴─────────────────────────────────┴──────────────────────────────────┴────────┘
```

### Decommissioning status

```

        src[srcIndex + 17] = 0x04; // flags: active

        // Second name entry (18 bytes)
        String name2 = "DOMAIN          ";
        System.arraycopy(name2.getBytes("US-ASCII"), 0, src, srcIndex + 19, 16);
        src[srcIndex + 34] = 0x00; // hex code
        src[srcIndex + 35] = (byte) 0x84; // flags: group, active

        // Third name entry (18 bytes) - matching queryAddress

    }
  });

  $(".table tr[data-href]").each(function() {
    $(this)
      .css("cursor", "pointer")
      .hover(
        function() {
          $(this).addClass("active");
        },
        function() {
          $(this).removeClass("active");
        }
      )
      .click(function() {
        document.location = $(this).attr("data-href");
      });
  });

question - i.e with `mc stat --version-id dm-version-id`

It must be noted that if active-active replication is set up with delete marker replication, there is potential for duplicate delete markers to be created if both source and target concurrently set a Delete Marker or if one/both of the clusters went down at tandem before the replication event was synced.This is an unavoidable side-effect in active-active replication caused by allowing delete markers set on a object version with `REPLICA`...

      $("#searchOptions").removeClass("active");
    }
  });

  $("[data-toggle='control-options']").click(function(e) {
    e.preventDefault();
    var target = $(this).attr("data-target") || $(this).attr("href");
    if (target) {
      $(target).toggleClass("active");
    }
  });

  $("#searchOptionsClearButton").on("click", function(e) {

 }\n  }\n\n  .btn-check:checked + &,\n  :not(.btn-check) + &:active,\n  &:first-child:active,\n  &.active,\n  &.show {\n    color: var(--#{$prefix}btn-active-color);\n    background-color: var(--#{$prefix}btn-active-bg);\n    // Remove CSS gradients if they're enabled\n    background-image: if($enable-gradients, none, null);\n    border-color: var(--#{$prefix}btn-active-border-color);\n    @include box-shadow(var(--#{$prefix}btn-active-shadow));\n\n    &:focus-visible {\n      // Avoid using mixin...

				Values:  [][]interface{}{{99.5}},
			},
		},
		{
			name: "Test convert bool value",
			input: map[string]interface{}{
				"active": true,
			},
			expect: clause.Values{
				Columns: []clause.Column{{Name: "active"}},
				Values:  [][]interface{}{{true}},
			},
		},
	}

	for _, tc := range testCase {
		t.Run(tc.name, func(t *testing.T) {

    }

    public List<ArtifactRepository> getRemoteRepositories() {
        return remoteRepositories;
    }

    public boolean isActive() {
        return active;
    }

    public void enable() {
        active = true;

        // TODO if it was null, we really need to go find them now... or is this taken care of by the ordering?
        if (children != null) {

			AssertObjEqual(t, newUser, user, "ID", "CreatedAt", "UpdatedAt", "DeletedAt", "Name", "Age", "Birthday",
				"CompanyID", "ManagerID", "Active")
		}
	}

	AssertObjEqual(t, user, expect, "ID", "CreatedAt", "UpdatedAt", "DeletedAt", "Name", "Age", "Birthday", "CompanyID",
		"ManagerID", "Active")

	t.Run("Account", func(t *testing.T) {

.carousel-item-next.carousel-item-left,.carousel-fade .carousel-item-prev.carousel-item-right,.carousel-fade .carousel-item.active{z-index:1;opacity:1}.carousel-fade .active.carousel-item-left,.carousel-fade .active.carousel-item-right{z-index:0;opacity:0;transition:opacity 0s .6s}@media (prefers-reduced-motion:reduce){.carousel-fade .active.carousel-item-left,.carousel-fade .active.carousel-item-right{transition:none}}.carousel-control-next,.carousel-control-prev{position:absolute;top:0;bottom:0;z-i...