Wir bauen auf dem vorherigen Kapitel auf.

## Über JWT { #about-jwt }

JWT bedeutet „JSON Web Tokens“.

Es ist ein Standard, um ein JSON-Objekt in einem langen, kompakten String ohne Leerzeichen zu kodieren. Das sieht so aus:

```
eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJzdWIiOiIxMjM0NTY3ODkwIiwibmFtZSI6IkpvaG4gRG9lIiwiaWF0IjoxNTE2MjM5MDIyfQ.SflKxwRJSMeKKF2QT4fwpMeJf36POk6yJV_adQssw5c
```

constrain future implementations, so the rule is that Go code can
hand a Go pointer to C code but must separately arrange for
Go to hang on to a reference to the pointer until C is done with it.
*/
package gmp

/*
#cgo LDFLAGS: -lgmp
#include <gmp.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

// gmp 5.0.0+ changed the type of the 3rd argument to mp_bitcnt_t,
// so, to support older versions, we wrap these two functions.

    private final String workstation = "TEST_WORKSTATION";

    @BeforeEach
    void setUp() {
        // MockitoExtension handles mock initialization
        // Type1Message.getDefaultWorkstation() is static, so we can't easily mock it without PowerMock.
        // We will proceed assuming it returns a predictable value or handle it as is.
    }

    @Test
    void testConstructor_withSigning() {

      </plugin>
      <plugin>
        <artifactId>maven-javadoc-plugin</artifactId>
        <configuration>
          <!-- Passing `-subpackages com.google.common` breaks things, so we explicitly exclude everything else instead. -->
          <!-- excludePackageNames requires specification of packages separately from "all subpackages".
               https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-584 -->

{* ../../docs_src/body_multiple_params/tutorial002_py310.py hl[20] *}


In this case, **FastAPI** will notice that there is more than one body parameter in the function (there are two parameters that are Pydantic models).

So, it will then use the parameter names as keys (field names) in the body, and expect a body like:

```JSON
{
    "item": {
        "name": "Foo",
        "description": "The pretender",
        "price": 42.0,

    return newBuilder().strong().build();
  }

  /**
   * Returns a new thread-safe interner which retains a weak reference to each instance it has
   * interned, and so does not prevent these instances from being garbage-collected. This most
   * likely does not perform as well as {@link #newStrongInterner}, but is the best alternative when
   * the memory usage of that implementation is unacceptable.

  /** Tests that the {@link Future#get(long, TimeUnit)} method times out correctly. */
  public void testTimeoutOnGetWorksCorrectly() throws InterruptedException, ExecutionException {

    // The task thread waits for the latch, so we expect a timeout here.
    try {
      future.get(20, MILLISECONDS);
      fail("Should have timed out trying to get the value.");
    } catch (TimeoutException expected) {
    } finally {
      latch.countDown();

  // way in such a visibility issue would surface is most likely as a failure of cancel() to
  // propagate to the input. Cancellation propagation is fundamentally racy so this is fine.
  //
  // Future versions of the JMM may revise safe construction semantics in such a way that we can
  // safely publish these objects and we won't need this whole discussion.

    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for
    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages

    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for
    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages