* connection is typically faster than establishing a new one.
 *
 * When a single logical call requires multiple streams due to redirects or authorization
 * challenges, we prefer to use the same physical connection for all streams in the sequence. There
 * are potential performance and behavior consequences to this preference. To support this feature,

      ImmutableList<T> group = groups.get(groupNumber);
      for (int itemNumber = 0; itemNumber < group.size(); itemNumber++) {
        // check related items in same group
        for (int relatedItemNumber = 0; relatedItemNumber < group.size(); relatedItemNumber++) {
          if (itemNumber != relatedItemNumber) {
            assertRelated(groupNumber, itemNumber, relatedItemNumber);

   * would be the right tool for the job here: {@code @Nullable} is the annotation that we're trying
   * to get rid of, and {@code @NonNull} would be wrong for our use case for the same reason as
   * {@code requireNonNull}: Our use case is the one in which {@code T} has parametric nullness—and
   * thus its value may be legitimately {@code null}.)
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("nullness")
  @ParametricNullness

/* jcifs smb client library in Java
 * Copyright (C) 2000  "Michael B. Allen" <jcifs at samba dot org>
 *
 * This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
 * modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
 * License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
 * version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
 *
 * This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,

/* jcifs smb client library in Java
 * Copyright (C) 2000  "Michael B. Allen" <jcifs at samba dot org>
 *
 * This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
 * modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
 * License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
 * version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
 *
 * This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,

- Each pool expects a minimum of 2 nodes per pool, and unique non-repeating hosts for each argument.
- Each pool expects each host in this pool has the same number of drives specified as any other host.
- Mixing `local-path` and `distributed-path` is not allowed, doing so would cause MinIO to refuse starting the server.
- Ellipses and bracket notation (e.g. `{1...10}`) are allowed.

        result = true;
      }
    }
    return result;
  }

  /**
   * Determines whether two iterators contain equal elements in the same order. More specifically,
   * this method returns {@code true} if {@code iterator1} and {@code iterator2} contain the same
   * number of elements and every element of {@code iterator1} is equal to the corresponding element
   * of {@code iterator2}.
   *

   * {@code put()} or {@code putAll()}, or {@code setValue()} on its entries.
   *
   * <p>In contrast, the maps returned by {@code rowMap().get()} have the same behavior as those
   * returned by {@link #row}. Those maps may support {@code setValue()}, {@code put()}, and {@code
   * putAll()}.
   *
   * @return a map view from each row key to a secondary map from column keys to values

        byte[] dst2 = new byte[256];
        int bytesWritten2 = netShareEnum.writeParametersWireFormat(dst2, 100);

        // Same number of bytes should be written
        assertEquals(bytesWritten1, bytesWritten2);

        // Data should be the same, just at different offsets
        for (int i = 0; i < bytesWritten1; i++) {
            assertEquals(dst1[i], dst2[100 + i]);
        }
    }

 *
 * <p>This uses the same efficient implementation as {@link Ordering#leastOf(Iterable, int)},
 * offering expected O(n + k log k) performance (worst case O(n log k)) for n calls to {@link
 * #offer} and a call to {@link #topK}, with O(k) memory. In comparison, quickselect has the same
 * asymptotics but requires O(n) memory, and a {@code PriorityQueue} implementation takes O(n log