// in the short hash. We saw that a mask of 0x7f would keep the 7-bit value 0x6f from a full
  // hashcode of 0x89abcdef. The imaginary `hash` value would then be the remaining top 25 bits,
  // 0x89abcd80. To this is added (or'd) the `next` value, which is an index within `entries`
  // (and therefore within `keys` and `values`) of another entry that has the same short hash

import java.io.IOException;
import java.io.OutputStream;

/**
 * An {@link OutputStream} that maintains a hash of the data written to it.
 *
 * @author Zoe Piepmeier
 * @since 16.0
 */
@Beta
public final class HashingOutputStream extends FilterOutputStream {
  private final Hasher hasher;

  /**
   * Creates an output stream that hashes using the given {@link HashFunction}, and forwards all

  AbstractFutureState() {}

  /*
   * We put various static objects here rather than in AbstractFuture so that they're initialized in
   * time for AbstractFutureState to potentially use them during class initialization.
   * (AbstractFutureState class initialization can log, and that logging could in theory call into
   * AbstractFuture, which wouldn't yet have had the chance to perform any class initialization of

  /** Cancels the request, if possible. Requests that are already complete cannot be canceled. */
  fun cancel()

  /**
   * Returns true if this call has been either [executed][execute] or [enqueued][enqueue]. It is an
   * error to execute a call more than once.
   */
  fun isExecuted(): Boolean

  fun isCanceled(): Boolean

  /**

For example, to declare a header of `X-Token` that can appear more than once, you can write:

{* ../../docs_src/header_params/tutorial003_an_py310.py hl[9] *}

If you communicate with that *path operation* sending two HTTP headers like:

```
X-Token: foo
X-Token: bar
```

The response would be like:

```JSON
{
    "X-Token values": [
        "bar",

   * analysis that that means "plain {@code T}" rather than the inferred type {@code @Nullable T}.
   * (And even if annotations on local variables were permitted as an optional hint, no annotation
   * would be the right tool for the job here: {@code @Nullable} is the annotation that we're trying

   * analysis that that means "plain {@code T}" rather than the inferred type {@code @Nullable T}.
   * (And even if annotations on local variables were permitted as an optional hint, no annotation
   * would be the right tool for the job here: {@code @Nullable} is the annotation that we're trying

   * Ideally, this class would have exposed only constructors that require a non-null cause. See
   * https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify-reference-checker/blob/61aafa4ae52594830cfc2d61c8b113009dbdb045/src/main/java/com/google/jspecify/nullness/NullSpecTransfer.java#L789
   * and https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify/issues/490.
   *
   * (That would also have ensured that its cause was always an Error, rather than possibly another

        getList().removeAll(MinimalCollection.of(duplicate)));
    assertFalse(
        "after removeAll(e), a collection should not contain e even "
            + "if it initially contained e more than once.",
        getList().contains(duplicate));
  }

  // All other cases are covered by CollectionRemoveAllTester.

 * features}, the features supported by the iterator; and {@code expectedElements}, the elements the
 * iterator should return in order.
 *
 * <p>The items in {@code elementsToInsert} will be repeated if {@code steps} is larger than the
 * number of provided elements.
 *
 * @author Chris Povirk
 */
@GwtCompatible
@NullMarked
public abstract class ListIteratorTester<E extends @Nullable Object>