Am häufigsten ist der „Implicit“-Flow.

Am sichersten ist der „Code“-Flow, die Implementierung ist jedoch komplexer, da mehr Schritte erforderlich sind. Da er komplexer ist, schlagen viele Anbieter letztendlich den „Implicit“-Flow vor.

/// note | Hinweis

     <span style="background-color:#007166"><font color="#D3D7CF"> INFO </font></span>  Waiting for application startup.
     <span style="background-color:#007166"><font color="#D3D7CF"> INFO </font></span>  Application startup complete.
```

</div>

**НАСТОЯТЕЛЬНО рекомендуется** написать или скопировать код, отредактировать его и запустить локально.

```

...to:

```Python
        ... "item_price": item.price ...
```

...and see how your editor will auto-complete the attributes and know their types:

![editor support](https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/img/vscode-completion.png)

For a more complete example including more features, see the <a href="https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/tutorial/">Tutorial - User Guide</a>.

                }
            }).start();
        }

        // Signal all threads to start at once
        startLatch.countDown();

        // Wait for all threads to complete
        assertTrue("Threads did not complete in time", doneLatch.await(5, TimeUnit.SECONDS));

        // All threads should fail with the same IOException (endpoint is blank)
        // But importantly, there should be no race condition errors

    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Should read valid structure with minimal test")
    void testReadBytesWireFormatBasicStructure() throws Exception {
        // Given - Create a complete SMB2 message with header
        byte[] buffer = new byte[512];
        int headerStart = 0;
        int bodyStart = Smb2Constants.SMB2_HEADER_LENGTH;

        // Write SMB2 header (64 bytes)
        // Protocol ID

        }
    }

    @Nested
    @DisplayName("Integration Tests")
    class IntegrationTests {

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should handle complete write request workflow")
        void testCompleteWriteWorkflow() {
            // Setup complete request
            byte[] data = new byte[2048];
            new Random().nextBytes(data);

            request.setFileId(testFileId);

        executor.shutdown();

        assertTrue(exceptions.isEmpty());
        assertEquals(threadCount * operationsPerThread, crawlerContext.getAccessCount());
    }

    /**
     * Test complete workflow scenario
     */
    public void test_completeWorkflow() {
        // Initialize context
        crawlerContext.setSessionId("workflow-session");
        crawlerContext.setStatus(CrawlerStatus.INITIALIZING);

          // Skip the elements larger than the partition.
          do {
            high--;
          } while (array[high] > partition);
          if (high < low) {
            break; // Pointers crossed. Partitioning complete.
          }
          swap(array, low, high); // End of innermost loop.
        }
        array[from + 1] = array[high]; // Insert partitioning element.
        array[high] = partition;

var errDiskNotFound = StorageErr("drive not found")

// errDiskOngoingReq - indicates if the disk has an on-going request in progress.
var errDiskOngoingReq = StorageErr("drive still did not complete the request")

// errDriveIsRoot - cannot use the disk since its a root disk.
var errDriveIsRoot = StorageErr("drive is part of root drive, will not be used")

// errFaultyRemoteDisk - remote disk is faulty.

		if opts.autotune {
			// if we have less drives than concurrency then choose
			// only the concurrency to be number of drives to start
			// with - since default '32' might be big and may not
			// complete in total time of 10s.
			if globalEndpoints.NEndpoints() < concurrency {
				concurrency = globalEndpoints.NEndpoints()
			}

			// Check if we have local disks per pool less than