* + i) mod array.length}. This is equivalent to {@code Collections.rotate(Booleans.asList(array),
   * distance)}, but is somewhat faster.
   *
   * <p>The provided "distance" may be negative, which will rotate left.
   *
   * @since 32.0.0
   */
  public static void rotate(boolean[] array, int distance) {
    rotate(array, distance, 0, array.length);
  }

  /**

   * + i) mod array.length}. This is equivalent to {@code Collections.rotate(Chars.asList(array),
   * distance)}, but is considerably faster and avoids allocation and garbage collection.
   *
   * <p>The provided "distance" may be negative, which will rotate left.
   *
   * @since 32.0.0
   */
  public static void rotate(char[] array, int distance) {
    rotate(array, distance, 0, array.length);
  }

  /**

   * + i) mod array.length}. This is equivalent to {@code Collections.rotate(Floats.asList(array),
   * distance)}, but is considerably faster and avoids allocation and garbage collection.
   *
   * <p>The provided "distance" may be negative, which will rotate left.
   *
   * @since 32.0.0
   */
  public static void rotate(float[] array, int distance) {
    rotate(array, distance, 0, array.length);
  }

  /**

   * + i) mod array.length}. This is equivalent to {@code Collections.rotate(Bytes.asList(array),
   * distance)}, but is considerably faster and avoids allocation and garbage collection.
   *
   * <p>The provided "distance" may be negative, which will rotate left.
   *
   * @since 32.0.0
   */
  public static void rotate(double[] array, int distance) {
    rotate(array, distance, 0, array.length);
  }

  /**

   * + i) mod array.length}. This is equivalent to {@code Collections.rotate(Floats.asList(array),
   * distance)}, but is considerably faster and avoids allocation and garbage collection.
   *
   * <p>The provided "distance" may be negative, which will rotate left.
   *
   * @since 32.0.0
   */
  public static void rotate(float[] array, int distance) {
    rotate(array, distance, 0, array.length);
  }

  /**

   * + i) mod array.length}. This is equivalent to {@code Collections.rotate(Chars.asList(array),
   * distance)}, but is considerably faster and avoids allocation and garbage collection.
   *
   * <p>The provided "distance" may be negative, which will rotate left.
   *
   * @since 32.0.0
   */
  public static void rotate(char[] array, int distance) {
    rotate(array, distance, 0, array.length);
  }

  /**

   * + i) mod array.length}. This is equivalent to {@code Collections.rotate(Shorts.asList(array),
   * distance)}, but is considerably faster and avoids allocation and garbage collection.
   *
   * <p>The provided "distance" may be negative, which will rotate left.
   *
   * @since 32.0.0
   */
  public static void rotate(short[] array, int distance) {
    rotate(array, distance, 0, array.length);
  }

  /**

   * + i) mod array.length}. This is equivalent to {@code Collections.rotate(Shorts.asList(array),
   * distance)}, but is considerably faster and avoids allocation and garbage collection.
   *
   * <p>The provided "distance" may be negative, which will rotate left.
   *
   * @since 32.0.0
   */
  public static void rotate(short[] array, int distance) {
    rotate(array, distance, 0, array.length);
  }

  /**

   * + i) mod array.length}. This is equivalent to {@code Collections.rotate(Bytes.asList(array),
   * distance)}, but is somewhat faster.
   *
   * <p>The provided "distance" may be negative, which will rotate left.
   *
   * @since 32.0.0
   */
  public static void rotate(byte[] array, int distance) {
    rotate(array, distance, 0, array.length);
  }

  /**

   * + i) mod array.length}. This is equivalent to {@code Collections.rotate(Bytes.asList(array),
   * distance)}, but is considerably faster and avoids allocation and garbage collection.
   *
   * <p>The provided "distance" may be negative, which will rotate left.
   *
   * @since 32.0.0
   */
  public static void rotate(double[] array, int distance) {
    rotate(array, distance, 0, array.length);
  }

  /**