* perform better than its longhand equivalent, but should not perform worse.
   *
   * @since 12.0
   */
  HashCode hashInt(int input);

  /**
   * Shortcut for {@code newHasher().putLong(input).hash()}; returns the hash code for the given
   * {@code long} value, interpreted in little-endian byte order. The implementation <i>might</i>

   * perform better than its longhand equivalent, but should not perform worse.
   *
   * @since 12.0
   */
  HashCode hashInt(int input);

  /**
   * Shortcut for {@code newHasher().putLong(input).hash()}; returns the hash code for the given
   * {@code long} value, interpreted in little-endian byte order. The implementation <i>might</i>

* Then check if the question (the vast majority are questions) is **clear**.

* In many cases the question asked is about an imaginary solution from the user, but there might be a **better** one. If you can understand the problem and use case better, you might be able to suggest a better **alternative solution**.

* If you can't understand the question, ask for more **details**.

### Reproduce the problem

   * Each bit is set to 1 for all remainders that indicate divisibility by 2, 3, or 5, so
   * 1, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29 are set to 0. 30 and up don't matter because they won't be hit.
   */
  private static final int SIEVE_30 =
      ~((1 << 1) | (1 << 7) | (1 << 11) | (1 << 13) | (1 << 17) | (1 << 19) | (1 << 23)
          | (1 << 29));

  /**

   * under the assumption that for long-running instances, observed
   * contention levels will recur, so the cells will eventually be
   * needed again; and for short-lived ones, it does not matter.
   */

  /**
   * Padded variant of AtomicLong supporting only raw accesses plus CAS. The value field is placed
   * between pads, hoping that the JVM doesn't reorder them.
   *

    * A "token" is just a string with some content that we can use later to verify this user.
    * Normally, a token is set to expire after some time.
        * So, the user will have to log in again at some point later.
        * And if the token is stolen, the risk is less. It is not like a permanent key that will work forever (in most of the cases).

```

1. This is the generator function. It's a "generator function" because it contains `yield` statements inside.
2. By using a `with` block, we make sure that the file-like object is closed after the generator function is done. So, after it finishes sending the response.

# Backporting fixes

* Cherry-picking is discussed in the original PR and subject-matter experts have approved the backport.
    * Behavioral changes should be highly scrutinized, while typo fixes don't require that level of scrutiny.
* It is preferable that cherry-picks are done by the istio-testing bot.
    * Automated cherry-picks do not need subject-matter experts to approve if discussed in the original PR.

   * very efficient. May be useful for calling code to fall back on an alternative implementation
   * that is slower than Unsafe.get/store but faster than the pure-Java mask-and-shift.
   */
  static boolean usingUnsafe() {
    return (byteArray instanceof UnsafeByteArray);
  }

  /**

Then, using the certificate, the client and the TLS Termination Proxy **decide how to encrypt** the rest of the **TCP communication**. This completes the **TLS Handshake** part.