這與 **FastAPI** 所能提供的性能水平相同。

你可以同時利用並行性和平行性，進一步提升效能，這比大多數已測試的 NodeJS 框架都更快，並且與 Go 語言相當，而 Go 是一種更接近 C 的編譯語言（<a href="https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r17&hw=ph&test=query&l=zijmkf-1" class="external-link" target="_blank">感謝 Starlette</a>）。

### 並行比平行更好嗎？

不是的！這不是故事的本意。

並行與平行不同。並行在某些 **特定** 的需要大量等待的情境下表現更好。正因如此，並行在 Web 應用程式開發中通常比平行更有優勢。但並不是所有情境都如此。

因此，為了平衡報導，想像下面這個短故事

### Other notable changes

    assertFinallyFailsWithException(closingFuture);
    waitUntilClosed(closingFuture);
    assertStillOpen(closeable1);
    assertClosed(closeable2, closeable3);
  }

  // We don't need to test the happy case for SuccessfulCombiner.call(Async) because it's the same
  // as Combiner.

  public void testWhenAllSucceed_call_failedInput() throws Exception {
    assertFinallyFailsWithException(

      }

      @Override
      public void forEach(Consumer<? super T> action) {
        checkNotNull(action);
        unfiltered.forEach(
            (@ParametricNullness T a) -> {
              if (retainIfTrue.test(a)) {
                action.accept(a);
              }
            });
      }

      @Override
      public Spliterator<T> spliterator() {

      collection = ((Multiset<?>) collection).elementSet();
    }
    /*
     * AbstractSet.removeAll(List) has quadratic behavior if the list size
     * is just more than the set's size.  We augment the test by
     * assuming that sets have fast contains() performance, and other
     * collections don't.  See
     * https://github.com/google/guava/issues/1013
     */

그리고 **FastAPI**를 사용함으로써 동일한 성능을 낼 수 있습니다.

또한 병렬성과 비동기성을 동시에 사용할 수 있기 때문에, 대부분의 테스트가 완료된 NodeJS 프레임워크보다 더 높은 성능을 얻고 C에 더 가까운 컴파일 언어인 Go와 동등한 성능을 얻을 수 있습니다<a href="https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r17&hw=ph&test=query&l=zijmkf-1" class="external-link" target="_blank">(모두 Starlette 덕분입니다)</a>.

### 동시성이 병렬성보다 더 나은가?

그렇지 않습니다! 그것이 이야기의 교훈은 아닙니다.

		}, idx, *client.host)
	}
	nerrs := ng.Wait()
	if freeze {
		freezeServices()
	} else {
		unfreezeServices()
	}
	return nerrs
}

// Netperf - perform mesh style network throughput test
func (sys *NotificationSys) Netperf(ctx context.Context, duration time.Duration) []madmin.NetperfNodeResult {
	length := len(sys.allPeerClients)
	if length == 0 {
		// For single node erasure setup.
		return nil

tempurl.host
tendo.yamagata.jp
tenei.fukushima.jp
tenkawa.nara.jp
tennis
tenri.nara.jp
teo.br
teramo.it
termez.su
terni.it
ternopil.ua
teshikaga.hokkaido.jp
test-iserv.de
test.ru
test.tj
tests.cx
teva
tf
tg
tgory.pl
th
thaibinh.vn
thainguyen.vn
thanhhoa.vn
thanhphohochiminh.vn
thd
the.br
theater
theatre
theshop.jp

        @Override
        public String toString() {
          return description;
        }
      };
    }
  }

  /**
   * Helper method for {@link #precomputedInternal} that doesn't test if the negation is cheaper.
   */
  @GwtIncompatible // SmallCharMatcher
  private static CharMatcher precomputedPositive(
      int totalCharacters, BitSet table, String description) {
    switch (totalCharacters) {

   * [host] is an IP address or is considered a public suffix by the public suffix list.
   *
   * In general this method **should not** be used to test whether a domain is valid or routable.
   * Instead, DNS is the recommended source for that information.
   *
   * | URL                           | `topPrivateDomain()` |