* passing a TypeToken<X>. This would be invalid. Maybe we could accept a TypeParameter<@PolyNull
   * X> if we support such a thing? It would be weird or misleading for users to be able to pass
   * `new TypeParameter<@Nullable T>() {}` and have it act as a plain `TypeParameter<T>`, but
   * hopefully no one would do that, anyway. See also the comment on TypeParameter itself.
   *

      // permitted not to throw because it would be a no-op
    }
    expectUnchanged();
  }

  @MapFeature.Require(value = SUPPORTS_PUT, absent = ALLOWS_NULL_KEY_QUERIES)
  public void testReplace_absentNullKeyUnsupported() {
    try {
      getMap().replace(null, v3());
    } catch (NullPointerException tolerated) {
      // permitted not to throw because it would be a no-op
    }
    expectUnchanged();
  }

      // permitted not to throw because it would be a no-op
    }
    expectUnchanged();
  }

  @MapFeature.Require(value = SUPPORTS_PUT, absent = ALLOWS_NULL_KEY_QUERIES)
  public void testReplace_absentNullKeyUnsupported() {
    try {
      getMap().replace(null, v3());
    } catch (NullPointerException tolerated) {
      // permitted not to throw because it would be a no-op
    }
    expectUnchanged();
  }

    /*
     * Even though it's weird to pass a defaultValue that is null, some callers do so. Those who
     * pass a literal "null" should probably just use `get`, but I would expect other callers to
     * pass an expression that *might* be null. This could happen with:
     *
     * - a `getFooOrDefault(@Nullable Foo defaultValue)` method that returns
     *   `map.getOrDefault(FOO_KEY, defaultValue)`
     *

### High availability

A stand-alone MinIO server would go down if the server hosting the drives goes offline. In contrast, a distributed MinIO setup with _m_ servers and _n_ drives will have your data safe as long as _m/2_ servers or _m*n_/2 or more drives are online.

   * class to begin with but rather something returned from a static factory method whose declared
   * return type is plain FilenameFilter. If we made such a change, then the annotation we choose
   * here would have no significance to end users, who would be forced to conform to the signature
   * used in FilenameFilter.)
   */
  @Override
  public boolean accept(File dir, String fileName) {
    return pattern.matcher(fileName).matches();
  }

      Object candidateKey = entry.getKey();

      /*
       * Assume that equals uses the == optimization when appropriate, and that
       * it would check hash codes as an optimization when appropriate. If we
       * did these things, it would just make things worse for the most
       * performance-conscious users.
       */
      if (key.equals(candidateKey)) {
        return entry.getValue();
      }

    "groups" : [ {
      "testProject" : "largeJavaMultiProject",
      "comment" : "We only test the multi-project here since for the monolithic project we would have no cache hits. This would mean we actually would test incremental compilation.",
      "coverage" : {
        "per_commit" : [ "linux" ]
      }
    } ]
  }, {

  /*
   * If n <= millerRabinBases[i][0], then testing n against bases millerRabinBases[i][1..] suffices
   * to prove its primality. Values from miller-rabin.appspot.com.
   *
   * NOTE: We could get slightly better bases that would be treated as unsigned, but benchmarks
   * showed negligible performance improvements.
   */
  private static final long[][] millerRabinBaseSets = {
    {291830, 126401071349994536L},

## Mounten einer Unteranwendung { #mounting-a-sub-application }

Wenn Sie gleichzeitig eine Unteranwendung mounten (wie beschrieben in [Unteranwendungen – Mounts](sub-applications.md)) und einen Proxy mit `root_path` verwenden wollen, können Sie das normal tun, wie Sie es erwarten würden.