}
	return id, nil
}

// TargetIDResult returns result of Remove/Send operation, sets err if
// any for the associated TargetID
type TargetIDResult struct {
	// ID where the remove or send were initiated.
	ID TargetID
	// Stores any error while removing a target or while sending an event.
	Err error
}

// Remove - closes and removes targets by given target IDs.

type ReplicationMRFStats struct {
	LastFailedCount uint64 `json:"failedCount_last5min"`
	// Count of unreplicated entries that were dropped after MRF retry limit reached since cluster start.
	TotalDroppedCount uint64 `json:"droppedCount_since_uptime"`
	// Bytes of unreplicated entries that were dropped after MRF retry limit reached since cluster start.
	TotalDroppedBytes uint64 `json:"droppedBytes_since_uptime"`
}

        buffer[bufferIndex + 36] = 0x00; // reserved

        int bytesRead = response.readParameterWordsWireFormat(buffer, bufferIndex);

        // Verify the correct number of bytes were read (37 bytes total)
        assertEquals(37, bytesRead);

        // Verify values through reflection

	w.err = err
}

func (w *writerAt) Close() (err error) {
	switch {
	case len(w.buffer) > 0:
		err = errors.New("some file segments were not flushed from the queue")
		_ = w.w.CloseWithError(err)
	case w.err != nil:
		// No need to close here since both pipes were
		// closing inside TransferError()
		err = w.err
	default:
		err = w.w.Close()
	}
	for i := range w.buffer {
		delete(w.buffer, i)
	}

            // MID checking not required here as we only read responses for which we're waiting
            // We only read what we were waiting for, so first guess would be no.
            final boolean verify = dgst.verify(buffer, i, size, 0, this);
            this.verifyFailed = verify;
            return !verify;
        }
        return true;

At that point, by noticing that the server took some microseconds longer to send the "Incorrect username or password" response, the attackers will know that they got _something_ right, some of the initial letters were right.

And then they can try again knowing that it's probably something more similar to `stanleyjobsox` than to `johndoe`.

#### A "professional" attack { #a-professional-attack }

func (initialSnapShot LeakDetect) CompareCurrentSnapshot() []string {
	var stackDiff []string
	for _, g := range pickRelevantGoroutines() {
		// Identify the Go routines those were not present in the initial snapshot.
		// In other words a stack diff.
		if !initialSnapShot.relevantRoutines[g] {
			stackDiff = append(stackDiff, g)
		}
	}
	return stackDiff
}

				bucket, humanize.Ordinal(er.setIndex+1))
		}

		disks, _, healing := er.getOnlineDisksWithHealingAndInfo(true)
		if len(disks) == healing {
			// All drives in this erasure set were reformatted for some reasons, abort healing and mark it as successful
			healingLogIf(ctx, errors.New("all drives are in healing state, aborting.."))
			return nil
		}

    latch.countDown();

    exec.shutdown();
    exec.awaitTermination(100, MILLISECONDS);
  }

  /**
   * Tests that all listeners complete, even if they were added before or after the future was
   * finishing. Also acts as a concurrency test to make sure the locking is done correctly when a
   * future is finishing so that no listeners can be lost.
   */

   * {@linkplain Object#equals equal} to the original, nor is it required to return even an object
   * of the same class. For example, if sublists of {@code MyList} instances were serializable,
   * those sublists might implement a private {@code MySubList} type but serialize as a plain {@code
   * MyList} to save space. So long as {@code MyList} has all the public supertypes of {@code