util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one

    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one

 * limitations under the License.
 */

package com.google.common.util.concurrent;

import static com.google.common.truth.Truth.assertThat;
import static java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertThrows;

import java.util.concurrent.Callable;
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

import static com.google.common.truth.Truth.assertThat;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertThrows;

import com.google.common.util.concurrent.ExecutionError;
import com.google.common.util.concurrent.UncheckedExecutionException;
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException;
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicReference;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should handle concurrent access patterns")
        void shouldHandleConcurrentAccessPatterns() throws InterruptedException {
            SmbSession mockSession = mock(SmbSession.class);
            Configuration mockConfig = mock(Configuration.class);
            when(mockSession.getConfig()).thenReturn(mockConfig);

import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.Set;
import java.util.concurrent.Semaphore;
import java.util.concurrent.locks.Lock;
import java.util.concurrent.locks.ReadWriteLock;
import java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock;
import java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantReadWriteLock;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**

import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.Set;
import java.util.concurrent.Semaphore;
import java.util.concurrent.locks.Lock;
import java.util.concurrent.locks.ReadWriteLock;
import java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock;
import java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantReadWriteLock;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**

import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertTrue;

import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch;
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;
import java.util.concurrent.Executors;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger;

import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;

/**

    }

    /**
     * Returns the index of the first occurrence of the specified object in the array.
     *
     * @param <T>
     *            the type of the array elements
     * @param array
     *            the array
     * @param obj
     *            the object to search for
     * @return the index of the first occurrence of the object in the array
     */

    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one