Ici, avec `ge=1`, `item_id` devra être un nombre entier "`g`reater than or `e`qual" à `1`.

{* ../../docs_src/path_params_numeric_validations/tutorial004_an_py39.py hl[10] *}

## Validations numériques : supérieur ou égal et inférieur ou égal

La même chose s'applique pour :

* `gt` : `g`reater `t`han
* `le` : `l`ess than or `e`qual

    assertEquals(c, navigableSet.higher(b));
    assertEquals(null, navigableSet.higher(c));
  }

  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): make "too small" and "too large" elements available for better navigation
   * testing. At that point, we may be able to eliminate the "hole" tests, which would mean that
   * ContiguousSet's tests would no longer need to suppress them.
   */
  @CollectionSize.Require(SEVERAL)

					// Break out on errors.
					sendResult()
					return
				}
			}

			sendResult()
			if !opts.autotune {
				break
			}

			// Try with a higher concurrency to see if we get better throughput
			concurrency += (concurrency + 1) / 2
		}
	}()
	return ch
}

func driveSpeedTest(ctx context.Context, opts madmin.DriveSpeedTestOpts) madmin.DriveSpeedTestResult {
	perf := &dperf.DrivePerf{

rget).data(e);n||(n=new this.constructor(t.currentTarget,this._getDelegateConfig()),g(t.currentTarget).data(e,n)),n._activeTrigger.click=!n._activeTrigger.click,n._isWithActiveTrigger()?n._enter(null,n):n._leave(null,n)}else{if(g(this.getTipElement()).hasClass(Me))return void this._leave(null,this);this._enter(null,this)}},t.dispose=function(){clearTimeout(this._timeout),g.removeData(this.element,this.constructor.DATA_KEY),g(this.element).off(this.constructor.EVENT_KEY),g(this.element).closest("...

## Future

By this point, it's already clear that **FastAPI** with its ideas is being useful for many people.

It is being chosen over previous alternatives for suiting many use cases better.

Many developers and teams already depend on **FastAPI** for their projects (including me and my team).

But still, there are many improvements and features to come.

**FastAPI** has a great future ahead.

        .putShort((short) 0x0000)
        .putShort((short) 0x0000);
    assertEquals(hashCode, hasher.hash().asLong());
  }

  public void testHashFloatIsStable() {
    // Just a spot check.  Better than nothing.
    Hasher hasher = HASH_FN.newHasher();
    hasher.putFloat(0x01000101f).putFloat(0f);
    assertEquals(0x49f9d18ee8ae1b28L, hasher.hash().asLong());

    hasher = HASH_FN.newHasher();

    assertThat(Resources.toByteArray(resource)).isEqualTo(I18N.getBytes(UTF_8));
  }

  public void testReadLines() throws IOException {
    // TODO(chrisn): Check in a better resource
    URL resource = getClass().getResource("testdata/i18n.txt");
    assertEquals(ImmutableList.of(I18N), Resources.readLines(resource, UTF_8));
  }

   * interned, thus preventing these instances from being garbage-collected. If this retention is
   * acceptable, this implementation may perform better than {@link #newWeakInterner}.
   */
  public static <E> Interner<E> newStrongInterner() {
    return newBuilder().strong().build();
  }

  /**

problems. If your service has multiple IP addresses, OkHttp will attempt alternate addresses if the
first connect fails. This is necessary for IPv4+IPv6 and services hosted in redundant data
centers. OkHttp supports modern TLS features (TLS 1.3, ALPN, certificate pinning). It can be
configured to fall back for broad connectivity.

And these models are all sharing a lot of the data and duplicating attribute names and types.

We could do better.

We can declare a `UserBase` model that serves as a base for our other models. And then we can make subclasses of that model that inherit its attributes (type declarations, validation, etc).