*
 * <p>{@code Object.hashCode} implementations tend to be very fast, but have weak collision
 * prevention and <i>no</i> expectation of bit dispersion. This leaves them perfectly suitable for
 * use in hash tables, because extra collisions cause only a slight performance hit, while poor bit
 * dispersion is easily corrected using a secondary hash function (which all reasonable hash table

//// tab | Test

`pip install "foo[bar]"`

Examples for string literals in code snippets: `"this"`, `'that'`.

A difficult example for string literals in code snippets: `f"I like {'oranges' if orange else "apples"}"`

Hardcore: `Yesterday, my friend wrote: "If you spell incorrectly correctly, you have spelled it incorrectly". To which I answered: "Correct, but 'incorrectly' is incorrectly not '"incorrectly"'"`

////

	// You can disable it by setting `SkipDefaultTransaction` to true
	SkipDefaultTransaction    bool
	DefaultTransactionTimeout time.Duration
	DefaultContextTimeout     time.Duration

	// NamingStrategy tables, columns naming strategy
	NamingStrategy schema.Namer
	// FullSaveAssociations full save associations
	FullSaveAssociations bool
	// Logger
	Logger logger.Interface

//// tab | Prueba

`pip install "foo[bar]"`

Ejemplos de literales de string en fragmentos de código: `"this"`, `'that'`.

Un ejemplo difícil de literales de string en fragmentos de código: `f"I like {'oranges' if orange else "apples"}"`

Hardcore: `Yesterday, my friend wrote: "If you spell incorrectly correctly, you have spelled it incorrectly". To which I answered: "Correct, but 'incorrectly' is incorrectly not '"incorrectly"'"`

////

`pip install "foo[bar]"`

Exemples de littéraux de chaîne dans des extraits de code : `"this"`, `'that'`.

Un exemple difficile de littéraux de chaîne dans des extraits de code : `f"I like {'oranges' if orange else "apples"}"`

Hardcore: `Yesterday, my friend wrote: "If you spell incorrectly correctly, you have spelled it incorrectly". To which I answered: "Correct, but 'incorrectly' is incorrectly not '"incorrectly"'"`

////

/// tip | 팁

문법 `{"name", "description"}`은 두 값을 갖는 `set`을 만듭니다.

이는 `set(["name", "description"])`과 동일합니다.

///

#### `set` 대신 `list` 사용하기 { #using-lists-instead-of-sets }

`set`을 쓰는 것을 잊고 `list`나 `tuple`을 대신 사용하더라도, FastAPI는 이를 `set`으로 변환하므로 올바르게 동작합니다:

{* ../../docs_src/response_model/tutorial006_py310.py hl[29,35] *}

## 요약 { #recap }

응답 모델을 정의하고 특히 개인정보가 필터링되도록 보장하려면 *경로 처리 데코레이터*의 매개변수 `response_model`을 사용하세요.

Il en serait de même si vous aviez quelque chose comme une <dfn title="Une union entre plusieurs types signifie « n'importe lequel de ces types ».">union</dfn> entre différents types dont un ou plusieurs ne sont pas des types Pydantic valides, par exemple ceci échouerait 💥 :

{* ../../docs_src/response_model/tutorial003_04_py310.py hl[8] *}

## Vous êtes pressés ? { #in-a-hurry }

<abbr title="too long; didn't read - trop long ; pas lu"><strong>TL;DR :</strong></abbr>

Si vous utilisez des bibliothèques tierces qui nécessitent d'être appelées avec `await`, telles que :

```Python
results = await some_library()
```

Alors, déclarez vos *fonctions de chemin d'accès* avec `async def` comme ceci :

```Python hl_lines="2"
@app.get('/')
async def read_results():

import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.node.TextNode;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.dataformat.yaml.YAMLFactory;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.dataformat.yaml.YAMLParser;

import org.apache.commons.lang3.tuple.Pair;
import org.elasticsearch.gradle.Version;
import org.elasticsearch.gradle.VersionProperties;
import org.elasticsearch.gradle.internal.test.rest.transform.RestTestTransform;

//// tab | Teste

`pip install "foo[bar]"`

Exemplos de literais de string em trechos de código: `"this"`, `'that'`.

Um exemplo difícil de literais de string em trechos de código: `f"I like {'oranges' if orange else "apples"}"`

Pesado: `Yesterday, my friend wrote: "If you spell incorrectly correctly, you have spelled it incorrectly". To which I answered: "Correct, but 'incorrectly' is incorrectly not '"incorrectly"'"`

////