that it's for a use case that actually comes up in the real world. We want to hear the
        real-world use case so the community can discuss and debate whether this feature is actually
        the *best* way to address the real use case, or whether or not a different approach might be
        more appropriate.


        It's okay if you can't provide complete context on a use case. We understand if you are not

    monitor.enter();
    try {
      State previous = state();
      switch (previous) {
        case NEW:
        case TERMINATED:
        case FAILED:
          throw new IllegalStateException("Cannot notifyStopped() when the service is " + previous);
        case RUNNING:
        case STARTING:
        case STOPPING:
          snapshot = new StateSnapshot(TERMINATED);
          enqueueTerminatedEvent(previous);

  }

  private void doEnterScenarioSetUp() {
    switch (scenario) {
      case SATISFIED_AND_UNOCCUPIED_BEFORE_ENTERING:
        enterSatisfyGuardAndLeaveInCurrentThread();
        break;
      case UNSATISFIED_AND_UNOCCUPIED_BEFORE_ENTERING:
        break;
      case SATISFIED_AND_OCCUPIED_BEFORE_ENTERING:
        enterSatisfyGuardAndLeaveInCurrentThread();

        long t;

        return switch (enc) {
        case TIME_1970_SEC_32BE -> enc_uint32be((int) (date.getTime() / 1000L), dst, di);
        case TIME_1970_SEC_32LE -> enc_uint32le((int) (date.getTime() / 1000L), dst, di);
        case TIME_1904_SEC_32BE -> enc_uint32be((int) (date.getTime() / 1000L + SEC_BETWEEEN_1904_AND_1970 & 0xFFFFFFFF), dst, di);

        opCodeString = switch (this.opCode) {
        case QUERY -> "QUERY";
        case WACK -> "WACK";
        default -> Integer.toString(this.opCode);
        };
        resultCodeString = switch (this.resultCode) {
        case FMT_ERR -> "FMT_ERR";
        case SRV_ERR -> "SRV_ERR";
        case IMP_ERR -> "IMP_ERR";
        case RFS_ERR -> "RFS_ERR";
        case ACT_ERR -> "ACT_ERR";
        case CFT_ERR -> "CFT_ERR";

        case QUERY -> "QUERY";
        case WACK -> "WACK";
        default -> Integer.toString(opCode);
        };
        resultCodeString = switch (resultCode) {
        case FMT_ERR -> "FMT_ERR";
        case SRV_ERR -> "SRV_ERR";
        case IMP_ERR -> "IMP_ERR";
        case RFS_ERR -> "RFS_ERR";
        case ACT_ERR -> "ACT_ERR";
        case CFT_ERR -> "CFT_ERR";

        case SMB_COM_TRANSACTION_SECONDARY -> "SMB_COM_TRANSACTION_SECONDARY";
        case SMB_COM_FIND_CLOSE2 -> "SMB_COM_FIND_CLOSE2";
        case SMB_COM_TREE_DISCONNECT -> "SMB_COM_TREE_DISCONNECT";
        case SMB_COM_LOGOFF_ANDX -> "SMB_COM_LOGOFF_ANDX";
        case SMB_COM_ECHO -> "SMB_COM_ECHO";
        case SMB_COM_MOVE -> "SMB_COM_MOVE";
        case SMB_COM_RENAME -> "SMB_COM_RENAME";

            switch (method) {
            case GET:
                hasGet = true;
                break;
            case POST:
                hasPost = true;
                break;
            case PUT:
                hasPut = true;
                break;
            case DELETE:
                hasDelete = true;
                break;
            case HEAD:
                hasHead = true;

            c = value.charAt(i);
            String escaped = switch (c) {
            case '\\', '"' -> "\\" + c;
            case '/' -> "\\/";
            case '\b' -> "\\b";
            case '\t' -> "\\t";
            case '\n' -> "\\n";
            case '\f' -> "\\f";
            case '\r' -> "\\r";

        switch (returnCode) {
        case ERROR_SUCCESS:
            return "Success";
        case ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER:
            return "Invalid parameter";
        case ERROR_INSUFFICIENT_BUFFER:
            return "Insufficient buffer";
        case ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED:
            return "Operation not supported";
        case ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED:
            return "Access denied";