* }</pre>
 *
 * This works because those types each implement {@code SuccessorsFunction}. It will also work with
 * any other implementation of this interface.
 *
 * <p>If you have your own graph implementation based around a custom node type {@code MyNode},
 * which has a method {@code getChildren()} that retrieves its successors in a graph:
 *
 * <pre>{@code
 * someGraphAlgorithm(startNode, MyNode::getChildren);
 * }</pre>
 *

      ImmutableList<Cell<R, C, V>> cellList,
      ImmutableSet<R> rowSpace,
      ImmutableSet<C> columnSpace) {
    // use a dense table if more than half of the cells have values
    // TODO(gak): tune this condition based on empirical evidence
    return (cellList.size() > (((long) rowSpace.size() * columnSpace.size()) / 2))
        ? new DenseImmutableTable<R, C, V>(cellList, rowSpace, columnSpace)

 *
 * <p>Advantages compared to {@code int[]}:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>All the many well-known advantages of immutability (read <i>Effective Java</i>, third
 *       edition, Item 17).
 *   <li>Has the value-based (not identity-based) {@link #equals}, {@link #hashCode}, and {@link
 *       #toString} behavior you expect.
 *   <li>Offers useful operations beyond just {@code get} and {@code length}, so you don't have to

	// use that and validate the authentication request. If not, we assume this
	// is an STS request for a claim based IDP (if one is present) and set
	// roleArn = openid.DummyRoleARN.
	//
	// Currently, we do not support multiple claim based IDPs, as there is no
	// defined parameter to disambiguate the intended IDP in this STS request.
	roleArn := openid.DummyRoleARN

import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.HashSet;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Set;
import junit.framework.TestSuite;

/**
 * Creates, based on your criteria, a JUnit test suite that exhaustively tests a Set implementation.
 *
 * @author George van den Driessche
 */
@GwtIncompatible
public class SetTestSuiteBuilder<E>

      // getDeclaredField to throw a NoSuchFieldException when the field is definitely there.
      // For these users fallback to a suboptimal implementation, based on synchronized. This will
      // be a definite performance hit to those users.
      thrownReflectionFailure = reflectionFailure;
      helper = new SynchronizedAtomicHelper();
    }
    ATOMIC_HELPER = helper;

  public static <B, S extends B> ImmutableClassToInstanceMap<B> copyOf(
      Map<? extends Class<? extends S>, ? extends S> map) {
    if (map instanceof ImmutableClassToInstanceMap) {
      @SuppressWarnings("rawtypes") // JDT-based J2KT Java frontend does not permit the direct cast
      Map rawMap = map;
      @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // covariant casts safe (unmodifiable)

    if (buffer.remaining() > 0) {
      processRemaining(buffer);
      Java8Compatibility.position(buffer, buffer.limit());
    }
    return makeHash();
  }

  /**
   * Computes a hash code based on the data that have been provided to this hasher. This is called
   * after all chunks are handled with {@link #process} and any leftover bytes that did not make a
   * complete chunk are handled with {@link #processRemaining}.

     *
     * <p>Canceling this future will attempt to cancel all the component futures.
     *
     * @return a future whose result is based on {@code combiner} (or based on the input futures
     *     passed to {@code whenAllSucceed}, if that is the method you used to create this {@code
     *     FutureCombiner}). Even if you don't care about the value of the future, you should

    }

    @Inject
    public DefaultLifecycles(LifecycleRegistry registry, Lookup lookup) {
        this.lookup = lookup;
        this.registry = registry;
    }

    /**
     * Get lifecycle based on phase
     *
     * @param phase
     * @return
     */
    public Lifecycle get(String phase) {
        return getPhaseToLifecycleMap().get(phase);
    }

    /**