SIG CLI expanded on debugging with `kubectl` to support two new debugging workflows: debugging workloads by creating a copy, and debugging nodes by creating a container in host namespaces. These can be convenient to:
 - Insert a debug container in clusters that don’t have ephemeral containers enabled 

13430..13438  ; disallowed                             # 12.0 EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPH VERTICAL JOINER..EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPH END SEGMENT
13439..1343F  ; disallowed                             # 15.0 EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPH INSERT AT MIDDLE..EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPH END WALLED ENCLOSURE
13440..13455  ; valid                                  # 15.0 EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPH MIRROR HORIZONTALLY..EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPH MODIFIER DAMAGED

```console
$ pip install email-validator
```

oder mit:

```console
$ pip install "pydantic[email]"
```

///

Wir verwenden dieses Modell, um sowohl unsere Eingabe- als auch Ausgabedaten zu deklarieren:

{* ../../docs_src/response_model/tutorial002_py310.py hl[16] *}

    assert response.headers["content-type"] == json_type


def test_router_a_a_override():
    with client:
        response = client.get("/a/a/override")
    assert response.content == b"Hello A A"
    assert response.headers["content-type"] == text_type


def test_router_a_b():
    with client:
        response = client.get("/a/b")
    assert response.content == b"Hello A B"

        json={"name": "foo", "value": 123},
    )
    assert status_code == 200
    assert body == b'{"name":"foo","value":123,"dep":42}'


def test_sync_return_dict_without_response_model(benchmark, client: TestClient) -> None:
    status_code, body = _bench_get(benchmark, client, "/sync/dict-no-response-model")
    assert status_code == 200
    assert body == b'{"name":"foo","value":123}'

    assert response.status_code == 200
    assert response.json() == {
        "name": "Foo",
        "price": 50.5,
        "description": None,
        "tax": None,
    }


def test_post_with_str_float(client: TestClient):
    response = client.post("/items/", json={"name": "Foo", "price": "50.5"})
    assert response.status_code == 200
    assert response.json() == {
        "name": "Foo",

    response = client.post(path)
    assert response.status_code == 200, response.text
    assert response.json() == {"p": None}


@pytest.mark.parametrize(
    "path",
    ["/optional-list-str", "/model-optional-list-str"],
)
def test_optional_list_str(path: str):
    client = TestClient(app)
    response = client.post(path, data={"p": ["hello", "world"]})
    assert response.status_code == 200

    def endpoint(response: Annotated[Response, Depends(modify_response)]):
        return {"status": "ok"}

    client = TestClient(app)
    resp = client.get("/")

    assert resp.status_code == 200
    assert resp.json() == {"status": "ok"}
    assert resp.headers.get("X-Custom") == "modified"


def test_response_with_depends_default():
    """Response type hint should work with Response = Depends(...)."""
    app = FastAPI()

    response = client.get(path)
    assert response.status_code == 200
    assert response.json() == {"p": None}


@pytest.mark.parametrize(
    "path",
    ["/optional-str", "/model-optional-str"],
)
def test_optional_str(path: str):
    client = TestClient(app)
    client.cookies.set("p", "hello")
    response = client.get(path)
    assert response.status_code == 200
    assert response.json() == {"p": "hello"}

///

Das Einzige, was die von `GzipRequest.get_route_handler` zurückgegebene Funktion anders macht, ist die Konvertierung von `Request` in ein `GzipRequest`.

Dabei kümmert sich unser `GzipRequest` um die Dekomprimierung der Daten (falls erforderlich), bevor diese an unsere *Pfadoperationen* weitergegeben werden.

Danach ist die gesamte Verarbeitungslogik dieselbe.